Print Article

Withdrawing a 13-year regulatory [JFSC] ban is a huge decision.


As outlined below, the JFSC has withdrawn all Directions [restrictions to work] against Mr Russell Shelton Homer (Mr Homer).

The JFSC public statement is limited in facts, but this case must remind us of the importance of managing regulatory risk.

And what is clear after being banned for 13 years, withdrawing the direction[ban] is a huge decision for all parties.

For Mr Homer, the cost [personal/financial/reputational] of not being able to trade and having to do something else must have been huge.

It will be interesting if we will hear from Mr Homer.

Full details of the JFSC announcement are below

After 13 years, the JFSC withdraw "Regulatory Directions" on an ex-regulated person

The JFSC has issued a public statement [13 October 2022] stating it has WITHDRAWN ALL Directions against Mr Russell Shelton Homer (Mr Homer)

The JFSC say:-
  1. On 21 September 2022, the JFSC agreed to exercise its statutory power[4] TO WITHDRAW THE DIRECTIONS IN FULL.
  2. After having considered
    • Mr Homer's submissions and
    • Relevant information in the JFSC's possession,


Since 2009 Mr Homer has not been able to work [gainfully] in Jersey's financial services industry because the directions prohibited Mr Homer from:

  1. Acting as a principal person or being employed as a principal person or key person, as defined under the Financial Services (Jersey) Law 1998 (the "Law") and
  2. In relation to carrying on financial service business,
    • Acting in any capacity with authorised signatory powers over any bank account or
  3. Being appointed to any office with the capacity to execute any legal documentation whatsoever; and
  4. Engaging in any other employment at all by any registered person, as defined in the Law,
    • Without first having applied to and obtained the prior written approval of the Commission
  5. []

April 2009
  1. On 23 April 2009, following an investigation by the JFSC, Mr Homer was
    • Issued with directions under Articl 23(1) of the FS(J)L and directions under the equivalent provisions of the other regulatory laws[1].
  2. The directions restricted Mr Homer's employment in Jersey's financial services industry.[NOTED ABOVE]
  3. An associated public statement was issued on 20 July 2010.
Recently [no date given]
  1. Mr Homer applied to the JFSC to have the direction withdrawn [4+5]
  2. Mr Homer made an application to the JFSC in respect of the directions and the associated public statement, in support of which he submitted information and documentation for the JFSC's consideration.
2022 Action
  1. The Jersey Financial Services Commission (JFSC) issued a 2022 public statement [13 October 2022] under Article 25(a) of the FS(J)L concerning directions given to Mr Homer under Article 23 of the Financial Services (Jersey) Law 1998 (FS(J)L)
  2. The public statements stated
  • Having considered Mr Homer's submissions and relevant information in the JFSC's possession, on 21 September 2022 the JFSC agreed to exercise its statutory power to withdraw the directions in full.


  • Banking Business (Jersey) Law 1991; Collective Investments Funds (Jersey) Law 1988; and Insurance Business (Jersey) Law 1996.
  • To include the equivalent in the other regulatory laws.
  • The JFSC states that if there are any enquiries, don't hesitate to contact the Enforcement team.
  • Pursuant to Article 23(6) of the FS(J)L and equivalent provisions in the other regulatory laws, any person to whom a direction is given may apply to the JFSC to have it withdrawn or varied.
  • Furthermore, the JFSC can vary or withdraw directions according to Article 23(4) of the FS(J)L and the equivalent provisions of the other regulatory laws.


The Team

Meet the team of industry experts behind Comsure

Find out more

Latest News

Keep up to date with the very latest news from Comsure

Find out more


View our latest imagery from our news and work

Find out more


Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us today

Get In Touch

News Disclaimer

As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email