
Welcome guidance on “Best Practices on Source of Wealth Due Diligence”
09/06/2025
Read more at: https://aml-cft.net/acip-releases-best-practice-paper-on-sow-due-diligence/
Singapore’s MAS-backed ACIP guidance on Source of Wealth Due Diligence brings a pragmatic shift.
The recent guidance from the AML/CFT Industry Partnership (ACIP), supported by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), marks a significant shift in how financial institutions (FIs) approach Source of Wealth (SoW) due diligence.
The guidance
- Introduces a risk-based, tiered approach to SoW due diligence, emphasising that the intensity of due diligence should be driven by the customer's inherent money laundering/terrorism financing (ML/TF) risk, rather than the banking segment they fall under.
- It is designed to help financial institutions, especially those in private banking and wealth management, meet AML/CFT expectations without excessive documentation.
- It is highly relevant for anyone refreshing onboarding procedures or re-assessing high-risk client files.
- It is a departure from previous practices that often reserved rigorous SoW checks for private banking clients alone.
Key highlights include:
- Private Banking and Wealth Management: Enhanced due diligence for all clients, focusing on plausibility, materiality, and prudence in assessing business ownership, investment gains, employment income, and inheritance.
- Retail Banking: This is a two-tier system in which basic SoW information is collected initially, with complete corroboration triggered for higher-risk customers.
- Corporate Banking: SoW risk is evaluated at entity and beneficial ownership levels, with heightened scrutiny for entities with opaque structures or connections to high-risk geographies.
What stands out?
- It clearly distinguishes between Source of Wealth (SoW) & Source of Funds (SoF) - both important, but with different due diligence aims
- SoW doesn’t need to be verified to the last dollar — it should be plausible, risk-appropriate, and backed by credible evidence
- Emphasises a risk-based, evidence-led approach over exhaustive documentation, in line with FATF standards
- Introduces six “plausibility indicators” to assess if SoW aligns with the client’s profile
- Includes practical examples, particularly for founders, HNWIs, and complex structures
References
- AML / CFT INDUSTRY PARTNERSHIP BEST PRACTICES ON SOURCE OF WEALTH DUE ... www.abs.org.sg/docs/library/acip-bpp-on-source-of-wealth-due-diligence.pdf
- ACIP releases best practice paper on SOW due diligence https://aml-cft.net/acip-releases-best-practice-paper-on-sow-due-diligence/
The Team
Meet the team of industry experts behind Comsure
Find out moreLatest News
Keep up to date with the very latest news from Comsure
Find out moreGallery
View our latest imagery from our news and work
Find out moreContact
Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us today
Get In TouchNews Disclaimer
As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[www.gov.UK/government/publications/copyright-acts-and-related-laws]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email info@comsuregroup.com.