News
Print Article

US Fines UBS Record $125 Million for 'Willful' Anti-Money Laundering Violations

04/08/2026

The US Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) has imposed a historic $125 million civil money penalty on UBS Financial Services Inc. (UBSFS), the US broker-dealer arm of Swiss banking group UBS, for willful violations of the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA).

  • Announced on 3 August 2026, this is the largest penalty FinCEN has ever levied against a broker-dealer for BSA breaches.
  • UBSFS admitted the violations, which centred on failures to implement and maintain an effective anti-money laundering (AML) programme and to file required suspicious activity reports (SARs).

Repeat Offender Status

  • This marks FinCEN's second enforcement action against the firm.
  • In December 2018, UBSFS settled with FinCEN for $14.5 million over similar AML shortcomings, including inadequate monitoring of foreign currency wires caused by weaknesses in its automated systems.
  • Despite assurances that it would remediate those issues, the firm failed to do so.

Between January 2019 and June 2023,

  • UBSFS did not appropriately monitor more than 50,000–61,500 foreign currency wires with an aggregate value exceeding $10–10.5 billion.
  • FinCEN learned of these ongoing failures only through its own investigation after a regulatory examination; the firm did not disclose them.

Customer Due Diligence Failures

  • UBSFS also fell short on customer due diligence (CDD) obligations, particularly for high-risk clients with links to Russia and Latin America.
  • The regulator identified cases where the firm failed to properly assess and mitigate money-laundering and illicit-finance risks tied to clients' sources of wealth, including negative media reports alleging connections to corruption, fraud and money laundering.
  • In at least one instance, this occurred even after an internal UBS affiliate raised concerns.
  • These deficiencies meant the firm failed to report hundreds of suspicious transactions promptly, depriving law enforcement of potentially critical information.

Reuters reported that one example involved a

  • Russian oligarch with close ties to President Vladimir Putin who maintained accounts despite public questions about his wealth, alleged money-laundering links, and connections to a company invested in Iranian digital assets.

Coordinated Regulatory Action and Remediation

The $125 million FinCEN assessment forms part of a broader coordinated resolution. Related settlements include:

  • FINRA: $20 million
  • SEC: $20 million
  • CFTC: $8 million

These payments are credited against the FinCEN total.

As part of the FinCEN consent order,

  • UBSFS must engage an independent third party to conduct a lookback review of undetected suspicious transactions and a full review of its AML programme.

The independent review will specifically examine the programme's effectiveness against priority illicit-finance risks, including:

  • US Southwest border, cartels and possible narcotics trafficking
  • Iran
  • Russia
  • Venezuela

FinCEN has indicated it may waive up to $15 million of the penalty if the firm satisfactorily completes the review and implements the recommended improvements.

FinCEN Director Andrea Gacki stated:

  • "Today's historic action against UBSFS should send a clear message that recidivist financial institutions will face severe repercussions.
  • Repeat violators of the Bank Secrecy Act jeopardise the integrity of our financial system, especially those that expose it to high-risk customers and activities without effective controls."

UBS said

  • It cooperated fully with regulators and has made significant investments to strengthen its AML programme in line with leading industry practices.

Why This Matters

  • The case underscores FinCEN's focus on recidivism and meaningful remediation.
  • Financial institutions are expected to fix identified AML deficiencies promptly and to maintain risk-based CDD that goes beyond superficial documentation—particularly for wealth-management clients from or linked to higher-risk jurisdictions.
  • Failures of this scale and duration leave the financial system exposed and law enforcement short of timely intelligence.

Primary and secondary sources

Figures for the exact number of unmonitored wires and total value vary slightly across official and secondary reports (50,000+ / >$10 billion in the FinCEN release; higher in some FINRA and media accounts). The core findings of willful, unremediated failures and the record nature of the penalty are consistent across primary sources.

FINES MONEY LAUNDERING CDD

The Team

Meet the team of industry experts behind Comsure

Find out more

Latest News

Keep up to date with the very latest news from Comsure

Find out more

Gallery

View our latest imagery from our news and work

Find out more

Contact

Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us today

Get In Touch

News Disclaimer

As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[www.gov.UK/government/publications/copyright-acts-and-related-laws]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email info@comsuregroup.com.