UK Legal professional privilege: disclosures to the MLRO and consultations
If you think you’ve identified signs of money laundering, you may need to report your suspicions to your practice's money laundering reporting officer (MLRO) to comply with anti-money laundering legislation.
Chapter 13 of the anti-money laundering guidance for the legal sector states that
- Section 330(9A) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 - “protects the privilege attaching to any disclosure made to a nominated officer for the purposes of obtaining advice about whether or not a disclosure should be made”.
However, Section 330(9A) does not apply
- If the person making the disclosure to the nominated officer intends for it to be a disclosure and not a consultation for the purposes of obtaining advice from the nominated officer.
In the former case,
- The information is not protected by legal professional privilege, so the nominated officer’s own reporting duty may potentially be triggered.
Disclosures to the MLRO and consultations AND 'nominated officer reporting form'.
- To help make the distinction between disclosures to the MLRO and consultations for the purposes of obtaining advice from the MLRO on whether a disclosure should be made, firms may wish to implement a 'nominated officer reporting form'.
- This form could be used when a formal disclosure is intended.
- Any disclosures made to the MLRO before the form is used could therefore be treated as for the purposes of obtaining advice.
- This would clarify when the relevant information in the hands of the nominated officer remains privileged, removing the nominated officer's onward disclosure duty to the National Crime Agency.
Meet the team of industry experts behind ComsureFind out more
Keep up to date with the very latest news from ComsureFind out more
View our latest imagery from our news and workFind out more
Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us todayGet In Touch
As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[www.gov.UK/government/publications/copyright-acts-and-related-laws]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email email@example.com.