Print Article



“Deep corruption” is at the heart of a criminal case against two men accused of bribing Saudi Arabian officials to secure lucrative defence contracts with the UK government, according to the prosecution at Southwark Crown Court

The case is brought by the Serious Fraud Office and relates to:-

  • A UK government deal to provide communications services to the Saudi Arabian National Guard (SANG)
  • The SANG is a separate military force from the army in Saudi Arabia, comprising more than 100,000 men. It has been deployed within and outside the country and its duties include protection of the royal family.
  • The deal was delivered by GPT Special Project Management, a now defunct unit of Airbus.

The backdrop to the case stems from the 1970s,

  • When the UK government entered into agreements with the SANG to provide MoD and civilian contractor assistance to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in the installation and operation of its communications logistics.
  • The work was known as the SANGCOM project, and since the mid-1990s GPT had contracts with the MoD to carry out the work for the SANG.

The accused are:-

  • Jeffrey Cook, 67, former managing director of GPT, and
  • John Mason, 81, an accountant and part-owner of some of GPT’s subcontractor companies,

Two other men were also arrested and investigated in connection with the case, the jury heard. Both have been deemed too unwell to face trial.

  • Former MoD employee Terence Dorothy and
  • Simec co-founder Peter Austin,

Cook and Mason are accused of

  • Paying bribes of nearly £10mn to Saudi officials to win business between 2007 and 2012.

Both the defendants deny the charges against them,

  • For which the joint charge of corruption carries a seven-year maximum sentence in prison.

Cook is also charged with one count of misconduct in public office between 2004 and 2008 in relation to

  • Allegations he sought and received commissions in connection with work placed by him when he was an employee of the MoD, where he worked before GPT.
  • Receiving kickbacks in the form of tens of thousands of pounds in cash and two cars.

On the first count, misconduct in public office, the sentence is unlimited.

In opening arguments on Wednesday, the jury sitting at Southwark Crown Court were told they must decide whether

  • The accused [Cook and Mason] knew they were making corrupt payments in relation to the arrangements between the UK MINISTRY OF DEFENCE and the SAUDI ARABIAN NATIONAL GUARD (SANG) for the installation and operation of Saudi military communications networks.

Prosecutor Mark Heywood KC said

  • The Saudi public official recipients did nothing to justify any form of payment . . . those payments were bribes
  • There is no proper or legitimate reason why those officials and intermediaries should have been paid the large sums that they received
  • GPT also used subcontractors owned by Mason, known as the Simec companies.
  • According to the prosecution, GPT paid “substantial sums of money” — authorised by Cook, who used the Simec companies and Mason — to bribe high-ranking officials in the SANG so that the company could procure and keep renewing its lucrative SANGCOM contracts.

The trial is expected to finish in March 2024.



The Team

Meet the team of industry experts behind Comsure

Find out more

Latest News

Keep up to date with the very latest news from Comsure

Find out more


View our latest imagery from our news and work

Find out more


Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us today

Get In Touch

News Disclaimer

As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email