UK-FRC Slaps Major Sanctions on Auditor of Gupta Family Group Companies for "Egregious" Independence Failures
24/06/2026
The UK's Financial Reporting Council (FRC) has delivered a stinging rebuke and penalties to a small London audit firm and its managing partner [ King & King and Milankumar Patel ] over
- Serious failures in the audits of four companies linked to Sanjeev Gupta's Gupta Family Group (GFG) Alliance.
In a decision published on 23 June 2026, the FRC
- Fined a combined total of approximately £378,184,
- Issued severe reprimands, and
- Imposed tough restrictions including a temporary ban on Patel performing any statutory audit work.
Why This Case Matters
- This decision highlights ongoing concerns about auditor independence, particularly when smaller firms become heavily dependent on one client group. It forms part of the FRC's continued focus on improving audit quality following high-profile corporate failures in recent years.
- The case also shows that even audits of companies connected to major ongoing fraud investigations can face intense regulatory scrutiny on technical compliance grounds.
The Four GFG Companies at the Centre of the Case
The sanctions relate specifically to statutory audits of:
- Liberty Speciality Steels Ltd (year ended 31 March 2019)
- Alvance British Aluminium Ltd (2019)
- Liberty Steel Newport Ltd (2019)
- Liberty Performance Steels Ltd (year ended 31 March 2020)
King & King had carried out more than 140 audits for GFG entities between 2018 and 2020, with Patel acting as the engagement partner who signed off the reports.
What Went Wrong?
The FRC found "egregious" failures and "widespread deficiencies" across the audits. The core issue was a clear threat of self-interest to independence and objectivity.
In 2021, GFG-related work accounted for over 40% of King & King's total firm income massively breaching the normal 15% threshold for a single client or connected group. This heavy financial reliance led to a flawed ethical approach and compromised audit quality in key areas including:
- Audit planning and risk assessment
- Income and expense recognition
- Going concern assessments
- Financial statement disclosures
The regulator concluded that the audits did not satisfy the relevant requirements.
Sanctions Breakdown
King & King (the firm):
- Financial penalty: £70,000 (reduced to £52,000 after 25% discount for admissions and early settlement)
- Severe reprimand
- Declaration that the four audits failed to meet standards
- Banned from seeking registration on the Public Interest Entity (PIE) Audit Register for 5 years
- Banned from accepting new audits of "high turnover" private companies for 2 years
- Must implement firm-wide ethics training and undergo extra monitoring by the ICAEW
Milankumar Patel (managing partner):
- Disgorgement of financial benefits: £288,684
- Additional penalty: £50,000 (reduced to £37,500)
- Total for Patel: £326,184
- Severe reprimand
- Withdrawal of Responsible Individual (RI) status
- Banned from performing any statutory audit work or influencing others for 3 years
- Cannot reapply for RI status for a further 2 years
FRC Acting Deputy Executive Counsel Andrew Twomey said the failures were "particularly egregious" and that the sanctions, which include disgorgement of fees and prohibitions on future audit work, send a clear message that such behaviour will not be tolerated.
Wider Context: GFG Alliance and the SFO Investigation
- The GFG Alliance is a major UK metals conglomerate (steel, aluminium and related industries) controlled by Sanjeev Gupta. It faced major turmoil after the 2021 collapse of its key lender, Greensill Capital, which had extended billions in financing (including government-backed loans).
- Since 14 May 2021, the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has been conducting a live investigation into suspected fraud, fraudulent trading and money laundering in relation to the financing and conduct of GFG companies. SFO investigators visited UK addresses linked to the group in April 2022. The investigation remains ongoing.
- GFG has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing and stated it is cooperating fully with the authorities.
Why This Case Matters
- This decision highlights ongoing concerns about auditor independence, particularly when smaller firms become heavily dependent on one client group. It forms part of the FRC's continued focus on improving audit quality following high-profile corporate failures in recent years.
- The case also shows that even audits of companies connected to major ongoing fraud investigations can face intense regulatory scrutiny on technical compliance grounds.
Sources
- Official FRC Press Notice (23 June 2026) https://www.frc.org.uk/news-and-events/news/2026/06/sanctions-against-king-king-and-mr-milankumar-patel/
- The Guardian – "Audit firm to Gupta metals empire fined and banned for 'egregious' failures" (23 June 2026) https://www.theguardian.com/business/2026/jun/23/audit-firm-gupta-metals-empire-fined-and-banned-frc-uk
- Serious Fraud Office – GFG Alliance case page (ongoing investigation) https://www.gov.uk/sfo-cases/gupta-family-group-gfg-alliance
- Reuters – "UK regulator sanctions auditor of metals magnate Sanjeev Gupta's GFG Alliance" (23 June 2026) https://www.reuters.com/business/uk-regulator-sanctions-auditor-metals-magnate-sanjeev-guptas-gfg-alliance-2026-06-23/
- Accountancy Today – "FRC sanctions King and King over audit failures" (23 June 2026) https://www.accountancytoday.co.uk/2026/06/23/frc-penalises-king-and-king-over-audit-failures/
The Team
Meet the team of industry experts behind Comsure
Find out moreLatest News
Keep up to date with the very latest news from Comsure
Find out moreGallery
View our latest imagery from our news and work
Find out moreContact
Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us today
Get In TouchNews Disclaimer
As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[www.gov.UK/government/publications/copyright-acts-and-related-laws]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email info@comsuregroup.com.