Print Article

UK authorities were criticised for failing to prosecute financial crime enablers and wealthy tax cheats.


A decade of fresh data shows only a handful of cases were brought against financiers for ignoring money laundering red flags. At the same time, few “wealthy” people faced criminal consequences for tax fraud last year, according to new reports.

Prosecutors in Britain have been accused of being too timid in targeting financial criminals, with two separate reports last month highlighting low levels of enforcement against both financiers tasked with reporting suspicious money flows and wealthy tax cheats.

According to the most recent government data obtained by corporate crime lawyer Ruth Paley of Eversheds Sutherland and analysed by, the anti-financial crime network ACAMS news arm Between 2012 and 2021, U.K. authorities opened just 23 cases against bankers and other financial insiders for failing to report money laundering suspicions,

Under U.K. law, employees at financial institutions or other companies subject to anti-money laundering rules can be held criminally liable for failing to report suspicious transactions, either internally through their institutions or directly to the country’s financial intelligence unit.

The decade of data showed prosecutors brought an average of two cases per year, and Paley told

  • That it was more likely cases were being brought against people “tangled up in wider criminal conduct, such as employees placed inside a bank branch to help launder money.”
  • “These are unlikely to be hapless individuals who haven’t done their job properly,”

In 2020, a global investigation by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists and BuzzFeed News exposed the pivotal role played by the world’s biggest banks in facilitating global dirty money flows.

Based on a leaked trove of documents from the U.S. Department of Treasury, the FinCEN Files identified thousands of U.K. shell companies that received billions of dollars in suspicious transactions.

They showed how HSBC, Barclays and other top British banks courted high-value, high-risk clients.

Lawmaker Margaret Hodge, a prominent voice on anti-corruption matters from the United Kingdom’s Labour Party, told ICIJ that

  • “Just 23 criminal investigations” was an “appalling” figure that indicated a “clear reluctance from law enforcement to pursue individuals working in the banking sector.”

She Said:-

  • “We know from the FinCEN Files that high street banks all too often believe that they can get away with a tick box exercise, meanwhile failing to pursue blatant wrongdoing robustly,”
  • “The system needs a complete overhaul with tougher duties on banks and professional enablers and a well-resourced enforcement capability.”
  • We know from the FinCEN Files that high street banks all too often believe that they can get away with a tick box exercise, meanwhile failing to pursue blatant wrongdoing robustly.


In a separate report, U.K. authorities also came under fire for the low number of cases against wealthy tax cheats.

despite the outsized role the U.K. and its overseas territories, including the British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands and Jersey, play in enabling tax dodging and financial secrecy, only 11 “wealthy” people were prosecuted for tax fraud last year [According to an investigation by The Bureau of Investigative Journalism and TaxWatch]

About 800,000 British taxpayers are categorised as “wealthy”  — having an income above £200,000 (about $243,000) a year or £2 million (about $2.43 million) or more in assets — according to the U.K.’s tax authority, HM Revenue and Customs, but fewer than 100 have been prosecuted for tax crimes since 2017, TBIJ reported.

Dan Neidle, the founder of Tax Policy Associates, told TBIJ that:-

  • HMRC has focused on financial recovery through low-risk civil penalties and settlements rather than on costly criminal proceedings, despite the latter being a “way more powerful deterrent.”
  • “The problem is that [it undermines] the rule of law if people can do tax evasion, get caught, and then not face criminal penalties,” he said.

An HMRC spokesperson told TBIJ that:-

  • Its prosecution numbers continued to be impacted by pandemic-related court delays.
  • However, the authority still has “more than 300 people under criminal investigation as part of our work to tackle the wealthiest and most sophisticated offenders.”

Tristram Hicks, a financial crime consultant and former Scotland Yard detective, said:

  • An overhaul of the system was needed and suggested the U.K. could look to its neighbour for inspiration.
  • “The investigation of tax fraud would benefit from a multiagency approach like the Criminal Assets Bureau in Ireland, which appears to pursue tax evasion more frequently than the U.K.”



The Team

Meet the team of industry experts behind Comsure

Find out more

Latest News

Keep up to date with the very latest news from Comsure

Find out more


View our latest imagery from our news and work

Find out more


Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us today

Get In Touch

News Disclaimer

As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email