Tribunal upholds FCA ban and £2+ MILLION fine for corrupt and dishonest adviser
19/01/2026
The Upper Tribunal has upheld the FCA's decision to:
- Ban Darren Antony Reynolds from working in financial services and
- Fine him £2,037,892
The Tribunal noted that 'Mr Reynolds is clearly guilty of dreadful misconduct over a protracted period, which had dire adverse impacts on a large number of retail customers.
He is, as the Authority alleged,
- A corrupt and dishonest man lacking integrity.'
Mr Reynolds
- Was dishonest when he gave pension transfer advice and investment recommendations to his customers, causing them significant harm.
- Showed an apparent disregard for his customers’ interests. He encouraged British Steel Pension Scheme members to transfer out of their defined benefit pension scheme, despite knowing that the advice was wholly unsuitable.
- Also advised his customers to invest in high-risk and unsuitable products while at the same time hiding high exit fees and falsifying documents.
- Misconduct exposed hundreds of people to severe financial loss.
Over £17.6m has been paid in compensation to more than 470 affected customers, many of whom suffered losses exceeding statutory compensation limits.
In addition, Mr Reynolds:
- Let two unapproved people give pension advice, putting customers at risk.
When confronted with his misconduct, he lied to regulators, allowed vital evidence to be destroyed, and moved his family home into a trust to avoid paying his debts.
Therese Chambers, joint executive director of Enforcement and Market Oversight at the FCA, said:
- Mr Reynolds’ misconduct was the worst we saw out of all the British Steel Pension Scheme cases, and he caused untold damage to his clients. He acted in a way that was corrupt and dishonest, putting his own profits before people’s pensions and acting without integrity as he tried to cover his tracks.
- 'He has spent many years trying to evade responsibility for his actions. The Tribunal’s full endorsement of our findings now brings to an end the efforts to avoid accountability. We will pursue recovery of the penalty to the fullest possible extent and will not hesitate to bankrupt him if necessary. We will ensure that he does not retain a single penny of his corrupt profits.'
The Tribunal noted that 'Mr Reynolds is clearly guilty of dreadful misconduct over a protracted period, which had dire adverse impacts on a large number of retail customers. He is, as the Authority alleged, a corrupt and dishonest man lacking integrity.'
Notes to editors:
- Upper Tribunal judgement (PDF)Link is external
- Final Notice 2026: Darren Antony Reynolds (PDF).
- Decision Notice 2023: Darren Antony Reynolds (PDF)
- In addition to the FCA’s enforcement action, Mr Reynolds was disqualified in May 2021 from acting as a company director for 13 years following an investigation by the Insolvency Service.
- A Defined Benefit (DB) pension is a valuable investment with advantages that other investments cannot replicate. Strong reasons are required for a person to exit a DB pension scheme in favour of another investment.
- The Tribunal agreed with the FCA’s calculation of the financial penalty, which reflects the seriousness of the misconduct and includes an uplift for the aggravating factors. No settlement discount was applied.
- British Steel Pension Scheme – our approach to enforcement.
- Information for customers wishing to make a complaint to the FSCSLink is external.
- Find out more information about the FCA.
Source
Press Releases First published: 19/01/2026 Last updated: 19/01/2026
https://www.fca.org.uk/news/press-releases/tribunal-upholds-ban-fines-corrupt-dishonest-adviser
The Team
Meet the team of industry experts behind Comsure
Find out moreLatest News
Keep up to date with the very latest news from Comsure
Find out moreGallery
View our latest imagery from our news and work
Find out moreContact
Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us today
Get In TouchNews Disclaimer
As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[www.gov.UK/government/publications/copyright-acts-and-related-laws]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email info@comsuregroup.com.