'Tick box' AML Regime Isn't Working, Society Tells Treasury
Current money laundering regulations disproportionately affect small firms and promote 'tick box compliance', the Law Society has told the Treasury.
Responding to a consultation about the effectiveness of the UK's anti-money laundering regime, the Society warned that the current regime 'undermines the effectiveness and proportionality of the measures' and drives up costs for legal services consumers.
Law Society president I. Stephanie Boyce said:
- ‘At its centre, the UK AML regime should be effective at reducing money laundering and terrorist financing.
- It must be built on an evidenced-based assessment of the risks and what works to mitigate those risks.
- ‘A risk-based approach will be most effective, as it requires regulated persons to focus more fully on those clients and situations which present the greatest risk, rather than conducting a less rigorous, but nonetheless onerous and costly, assessment across a broader range of matters which is not effective in tackling money laundering.’
HM Treasury opened a call for evidence in July as part of the government’s economic crime plan.
A final report setting out the findings of the review and possible options for reform is expected to be published by the end of June next year.
Last week, the Law Society and the City of London Law Society denounced government plans for an economic crime levy,
Which aims to raise £100m per year by taxing businesses that are subject to UK money laundering regulations and have annual revenue of over £10.2m.
The professional bodies said it was more appropriate for improvements to be funded by taxpayers and other sources such as the assets recovered from criminals and AML fines imposed on the regulated sector.
Meet the team of industry experts behind ComsureFind out more
Keep up to date with the very latest news from ComsureFind out more
View our latest imagery from our news and workFind out more
Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us todayGet In Touch
As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[www.gov.UK/government/publications/copyright-acts-and-related-laws]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email email@example.com.