News
Print Article

The FCA issued £45.9 million in fines to Neil Woodford and Woodford Investment Management

06/08/2025

For serious failings in the management of the Woodford Equity Income Fund (WEIF), the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has imposed a total fine of £45.9 million on:

  • Neil Woodford
  • Woodford Investment Management (WIM)

Key Points:

  • Neil Woodford has been:
    • Fined £5,888,800.00
    • Banned from holding senior management roles and from managing funds for retail (DIY) investors.
  • Woodford Investment Management has been:
    • Fined £40 million.
  • The FCA found that between July 2018 and June 2019, Woodford and WIM:
    • Made “unreasonable and inappropriate investment decisions”.
    • Sold more liquid assets and bought less liquid ones, worsening the fund’s liquidity.
    • At the time of suspension, only 8% of the fund’s assets could be sold within 7 days, far below regulatory expectations.
  • The FCA concluded that Woodford had a “defective and unreasonably narrow understanding” of his responsibilities, particularly regarding liquidity management.
  • The fund was suspended in June 2019, trapping over 300,000 investors, and was later liquidated.
  • Woodford and WIM are contesting the FCA’s decision at the Upper Tribunal.

LONG READ

  • The Financial Conduct Authority has decided to fine Neil Woodford and his firm almost £46mn for “failures in their management” of the collapsed Woodford Equity Income fund, while also banning him from running money for DIY investors.
  • The FCA said it had decided to fine Woodford £5,888,800 and ban him from holding senior manager roles and managing funds for retail investors, while also fining Woodford Investment Management £40mn.
  • Woodford and his firm will contest the FCA’s decisions at an upper tribunal.
  • Woodford had achieved the status of one of the UK’s ‘star’ fund managers after decades of successfully running income funds.
  • However, the Woodford Equity Income fund, which had more than £10bn in assets at its peak in 2017, ended up suspending trading in 2019 and ultimately closing thanks to a combination of poor performance and the growing presence of illiquid assets in it.
  • The regulator had previously issued a ‘warning’ to Woodford, but only last year, while investors trapped in his fund eventually received a settlement in 2023, meaning around three-quarters of their losses were recovered.
  • The FCA has argued that Woodford’s decision to move the portfolio “away from large global companies towards UK companies which were frequently smaller and less well capitalised” in 2017 left the fund vulnerable to liquidity risks.
  • The regulator said:
    • “The FCA has concluded that between July 2018 and June 2019 [Woodford Investment Management] and Mr Woodford made unreasonable and inappropriate investment decisions”;
    • “They disproportionately sold more liquid investments (those that are easier to sell) and bought less liquid ones over this period. This meant that at the time of suspension, only 8 per cent of the investments held by the Woodford Equity Income fund could be sold within seven days;
    • Under the rules in place at the time, investors should have been able to access their funds within four days; and
    • “WIM and Mr Woodford did not react appropriately as the fund’s value declined, its liquidity worsened, and more investors withdrew their money. These disadvantaged investors who remained in the fund, compared to those who had withdrawn their investment before the fund was suspended.”

SOURCES

UNITED KINGDOM FINES

The Team

Meet the team of industry experts behind Comsure

Find out more

Latest News

Keep up to date with the very latest news from Comsure

Find out more

Gallery

View our latest imagery from our news and work

Find out more

Contact

Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us today

Get In Touch

News Disclaimer

As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[www.gov.UK/government/publications/copyright-acts-and-related-laws]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email info@comsuregroup.com.