Print Article

The EU want to Tackle tax evasion Enablers [SAFE]


The European Commission is assessing support for EU legislation to regulate tax intermediaries and, at the same time, tackle the abusive use of non-EU shell entities. The proposed mechanics aim to prohibit so-called 'enablers' from assisting with arrangements in non-EU jurisdictions that lead to tax evasion or aggressive tax planning impacting EU Member States.

This publication describes the various policy options being explored by the European Commission and highlights the possible practical implications for the investment management industry.

The EU's initiative is called [SAFE], which stands for Securing the Activity Framework of Enablers.


The European Commission has launched a Public Consultation covering Policy Options to prohibit so-called 'enablers' from facilitating tax arrangements in non-EU jurisdictions that lead to tax evasion or aggressive tax planning impacting EU Member States.

This is the European Commission's response to requests from the European Parliament to improve the regulatory framework for tax intermediaries, and it follows up on the European Commission's announcement to tackle the abusive use of shell entities established outside the EU.

The latter is fuelled by the Pandora Papers – a tax-related scandal – which exposed how Russian individuals on the sanctions list have hidden wealth outside the EU.


The initiative is referred to as SAFE, which stands for Securing the Activity Framework of Enablers.


The Public Consultation does not contain a legislative proposal (e.g., a draft EU-Directive), meaning very little is known at this stage. However, the European Commission has expressed that the term 'enabler' seeks to target persons 'who design, market and/or assist in the creation of tax arrangements or schemes in non-EU countries that lead to tax evasion or aggressive tax planning for the EU Member States.' Those familiar with DAC6 and the term 'intermediary' will recognize certain overlaps. It is therefore very well possible that the term enabler will not only capture tax advisers, but also a range of other service providers and in-house tax professionals. The European Commission has also announced that the legislative proposal will include clear and objective criteria for defining forms of aggressive tax planning that are prohibited. Given the EU's jurisdictional limits, it appears that these mechanics will be used to tackle shell entities established outside the EU.

Policy Options

The policy options under consideration by the European Commission all have in common that enablers will be prohibited from facilitating tax arrangements in non-EU jurisdictions that lead to tax evasion or aggressive tax planning impacting EU Member States.

The policy options include:

  • Due diligence procedures – This would require enablers to carry out a test to check whether an arrangement leads to tax evasion or aggressive tax planning. It also requires the enabler to maintain records of this due diligence procedure.
  • Due diligence procedures and mandatory registration – In addition to the due diligence procedure, this option will require enablers that provide tax services to EU tax residents to register in an EU Member State to be allowed to provide such services.
  • Code of conduct – This option would require enablers to follow a code of conduct to ensure that they do not facilitate tax evasion or aggressive tax planning.


As a legislative proposal has not (yet) been published, the exact impact remains guesswork for the time being. However, it is very well possible that these policy options would ultimately impact a wide range of service providers due to a broad scope of the term 'enabler'. In the investment management industry, this could theoretically include any party involved with investing and structuring past EU-borders (i.e., not only tax advisers, but also fund managers, investment managers and asset managers, as well as supporting corporate service providers). Whether industry specific carve-outs will be added remains to be seen (e.g., carve-outs for AIFs and AIFMs).

As risks of tax evasion and/or aggressive tax planning will need to be tested before assisting with an arrangement that includes a non-EU jurisdiction (e.g., the establishment of an entity outside the EU or investments into a non-EU jurisdiction, and vice versa), this could also mean that certain internal controls will need to be introduced to timely identify such arrangements, including a governance model to manage the connected compliance and required (technical) knowledge.

Defining aggressive tax planning is extremely challenging, as a line will need to be drawn between acceptable tax planning and aggressive tax planning, both of which are (currently) legal.


As witnessed with DAC6, which also targets aggressive tax planning arrangements, there can easily be overkill if the criteria used are too broad or generic. Moreover, depending on the criteria that the European Commission chooses to define aggressive tax planning, there may also be a challenge for enablers with the interpretation thereof (e.g., main benefit tests or undefined terms).


The current Public Consultation runs until 13 October 2022. The European Commission aims to adopt a final legislative proposal in the first quarter of 2023. This may be an EU-Directive or even a soft law approach. Such legislative proposal will be subject to another Public Consultation before it can be adopted by the European Commission. It is therefore to be expected that the first version of the legislative proposal will be published late 2022 or early 2023.



The Team

Meet the team of industry experts behind Comsure

Find out more

Latest News

Keep up to date with the very latest news from Comsure

Find out more


View our latest imagery from our news and work

Find out more


Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us today

Get In Touch

News Disclaimer

As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email