The Biggest Company in the world you have never heard about……..[it may be a lie!!!]
The UK companies house has another example of its inadequacies with the following breath-taking example.
A company was incorporated earlier this month with share capital that is larger than the annual economic output of the whole world
- Malaya Pro Industries Limited claims to have a share capital of £100,000,000,000,000,
Whatever weapons we have against Russian dirty money, Companies House ain't one of them.
Businesses are incorporated in the UK with blatantly false details, like the one claiming to have more share capital that the entire world's economic worth.
Earlier this month we had Business Secretary Kwasi Kwarteng downplaying fraud as not a “crime that people experience in their day-to-day lives”, despite the fact that you’re more likely to be a victim of fraud than any other crime.
Now Transport Secretary Grant Shapps has declared on ITV's Peston show that Companies House and “our auditing system” has “some of the highest standards in the world”, capable of spotting Russian dirty money being laundered in the UK.
I doubt that even Companies House would claim to have some of the highest standards in the world – you only have to go on to its website to see the disclaimer that it
“does not verify the accuracy of the information filed”.
One breath-taking example is a company incorporated earlier this month called Malaya Pro Industries Limited, supposedly with share capital of £100,000,000,000,000, which is more than the annual economic output of the whole world. https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/13889382/filing-history
If that’s laughable, other examples are potentially more serious.
Last year I wrote about a string of linked investment scam companies including Texmoore Limited, which had filed blatantly false accounts, the figures for 2020 simply being cut and pasted from 2019.
When I asked Companies House about this I was told:
- "Companies House does not currently have the statutory power or capability to verify the accuracy of information filed by companies."
- It added: "“Where we are made aware of potentially inaccurate or incomplete information, we will contact the company concerned and, if necessary, request that revised accounts are filed.”
More recently, there’s the company Goldman Sachs International Filiale Italiana Spa Limited, incorporated just a fortnight ago.
It provides a registered address at a London mail-forwarding service – the same one used by Malaya Pro Industries – and the sole director is an Indian national living in the United Arab Emirates.
Despite the use of the prestigious name, the real Goldman Sachs informed me this company has nothing to do with them.
- “We fully investigate all claims or instances of potential fraud using our name and will take appropriate action,” said a spokesman.
It’s a similar story with Citi Wealth Management Limited, incorporated on February 1, and which sounds like it might be the wealth management service offered by respected Citi Bank. It’s not.
- “We treat all incidents of potential misrepresentation very seriously and have launched a thorough investigation into this matter,” said a Citi Bank spokesperson.
Perhaps it is just coincidence that these companies are using names remarkably similar to those of well-known banking brands, but with fraud accounting for around 40% of all crime you can't help wondering if something more sinister is afoot.
According to banking body UK Finance, victims lost almost £129million in the first half of 2021 to impersonation scams in which crooks used the names of trusted bodies including banks, a situation not helped by the fact that gaping lack of checks carried out by Companies House.
A starting place for reform would be adopting the recent recommendation contained in the Treasury Committee's report on economic crime that the fee for incorporating a company be increased from £12 to £100.
It stated: "A fee of £100 for company formation would not deter genuine entrepreneurs, and would raise significant additional funding for Companies House and for the fight against economic crime."
Meet the team of industry experts behind ComsureFind out more
Keep up to date with the very latest news from ComsureFind out more
View our latest imagery from our news and workFind out more
Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us todayGet In Touch
As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[www.gov.UK/government/publications/copyright-acts-and-related-laws]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email firstname.lastname@example.org.