Swiss regulator gives the former CEO a telling off following the PDVSA money-laundering scandal.
The UK FT reported [JANUARY 2021] the former chief executive of private bank Julius Baer, Boris Collardi, has been formally reprimanded by Switzerland's market regulator for his role in connection with a sweeping South American money-laundering scandal.
BACK STORY - February 2020
- The Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (Finma) found that Julius Baer fell significantly short in combating money laundering between 2009 and early 2018.
- The shortcomings arose in connection with alleged cases of corruption linked to
- Petróleos de Venezuela SA (PDVSA), an oil company, and
- FIFA, the world soccer federation,
- Finma instructed Julius Baer to
- Undertake effective measures to comply with its legal obligations in combating money laundering and rapidly finalise the measures.
- Change the way it recruits and manages client advisers and
- Adjust remuneration and disciplinary policies.
MEDIA RELEASE - Julius Baer Group Ltd. - Zurich, 20 February 2020
- Closure of FINMA enforcement proceedings - Julius Baer greatly enhances risk control and compliance
Backstory - "PROJECT ATLAS" - 2018
- A case-by-case review of all the lender's accounts — internally dubbed "Project Atlas" — was completed just over a year ago at the cost of SFr87m.
- The bank undertook a comprehensive programme over the last two years to strengthen its global risk management, and made new appointments to key and leadership positions. This programme addressed many of the weaknesses identified by Finma. Further investments and measures are being implemented with high priority.
- The documentation standards for client data and active client relationships have already been further developed and improved. Both the front office and the control units were extensively involved in this project ('Atlas'), which was completed on schedule in late 2019, to ensure that the associated cultural transformation would be embedded in the organisation with lasting effect.
- Meanwhile, a separate internal review into Mr Collardi's tenure resulted in October's decision to withhold SFr2.5m in deferred pay owed to its former boss.
IN A STATEMENT JANUARY 2021, FINMA SAID
- it had concluded a long-running probe into four former employees of Julius Baer.
- It focused on almost a decade of "serious shortcomings" in compliance measures over the handling of dirty money from Venezuela's state-owned oil company, Petróleos de Venezuela (PDVSA).
- And a parallel investigation into corruption relating to the governing body of world football, Fifa — was concluded last February.
WHAT THE FINMA SAYS
- As a result of the scandal, Finma has also issued a harsh rebuke, with an indefinite ban on acquisitions, and the installation of a Finma-appointed independent auditor to monitor corrective action at the bank's Zurich headquarters.
FINMA SAID ITS INVESTIGATION HAD FOCUSED ON FOUR INDIVIDUALS.
- It has sent formal written reprimands to two of them [Mr Collardi was one of the two executives to receive a written reprimand]
- Is deciding on more severe enforcement action against a third.
- A fourth has been let off without sanction having agreed to retire from financial services.
FINMA - WHY NO NAMES
- As is commonly the case in regulatory actions in privacy-conscious Switzerland, Finma did not name any of those concerned. However, it is reported that a spokesperson for Mr Collardi said
- He was "pleased . . . that the Finma review in the Julius Baer matter has been completed."
- Mr Collardi accepted the reprimand that had been issued, the person said. "The key is that this decision brings this matter to a close."
WHERE IS HE NOW AND WHAT HAS BEEN SAID?
- Mr Collardi, 46, is now a partner at Julius Baer's Geneva-based rival Pictet.
- Pictet said it had taken note of the Finma decision and had "full confidence" in Mr Collardi's ongoing work for the group.
- Julius Baer declined to comment on actions taken against former employees.
Meet the team of industry experts behind ComsureFind out more
Keep up to date with the very latest news from ComsureFind out more
View our latest imagery from our news and workFind out more
Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us todayGet In Touch
As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[www.gov.UK/government/publications/copyright-acts-and-related-laws]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email firstname.lastname@example.org.