Swiss investigate a Russian oligarch who helped finance Tom Cruise's film Top Gun
Swiss prosecutors opened a case last year against Dmitry Rybolovlev, a Monaco-based mining tycoon worth an estimated $6.6 billion, but did not give details.
Dmitry Rybolovlev, a Russian billionaire, helped to finance the Tom Cruise blockbuster Top Gun: Maverick, a US lawsuit has revealed.
- AS Monaco football club a
- Artworks by Pablo Picasso, Henri Matisse and Mark Rothko.
- A $95 million Palm Beach mansion – bought from Donald Trump in 2018
What did he do?
- Dmitry Rybolovlev is said to have exercised "functional control" over a production company that signed a $200 million deal in 2020 with the Hollywood giant Paramount Pictures to fund up to a quarter of the budget of ten films.
- The deal with the production company, New Republic Pictures, was a welcome boost for Paramount when the Hollywood giant was struggling with a fall in revenues and cinemas closing because of the pandemic.
- According to documents lodged with the Los Angeles superior court, Rybolovlev moved his assets out of the venture after Russia invaded Ukraine last February and western governments began imposing sanctions on wealthy Russians.
- The lawsuit, seen by the Los Angeles Times, reveals Rybolovlev's involvement with Hollywood.
- It was filed by Bradley Fischer, New Republic's former president and chief content officer, claiming breach of contract and the return of $15 million he believes he is owed.
- In describing the background to the employment dispute, the lawsuit said the Top Gun deal with Paramount was achieved "with financial backing from a Russian oligarch and silent partner Dmitry Rybolovlev".
- It alleges that the Russian oligarch acted "through a series of agents, affiliates and subsidiaries".
- He denies wrongdoing.
- Rybolovlev, 56, was previously involved in a legal battle with his former art dealer Yves Bouvier.
- Bouvier, a Swiss, was cleared of fraud charges in 2019, a Monaco justice minister resigned and two top police officers were suspended after reports that they had worked on Rybolovlev's behalf.
Meet the team of industry experts behind ComsureFind out more
Keep up to date with the very latest news from ComsureFind out more
View our latest imagery from our news and workFind out more
Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us todayGet In Touch
As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[www.gov.UK/government/publications/copyright-acts-and-related-laws]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email firstname.lastname@example.org.