News
Print Article

South Africa Re-added to Jersey's Cannabis Exemption List – but with an 8-Month Lag.

30/06/2026

The Minister for External Relations has today (29 June 2026) made the Proceeds of Crime (Cannabis Exemption – List of Jurisdictions) (Jersey) Amendment Order 2026.

  • It adds South Africa back into the Schedule of approved jurisdictions under the Proceeds of Crime (Cannabis Exemption – List of Jurisdictions) (Jersey) Order 2021.
  • The Order comes into force on 6 July 2026 (seven days after it was made).

What the exemption actually does

  • The exemption provides that the production, supply, use, export or import of cannabis (or derivatives) that is lawful in an approved jurisdiction is not treated as "criminal conduct" under the Proceeds of Crime (Jersey) Law 1999.
  • Consequently, the proceeds of such activity are not treated as criminal property in Jersey — provided the jurisdiction is on the approved list at the relevant time.
  • If a jurisdiction is not on the list, the exemption does not apply, even if the cannabis activity is lawful in that country.

FATF grey list

  • The Jersey Schedule is not a simple mirror or automatic inverse of the FATF grey list.
  • It is a Jersey-specific, positive list that is heavily influenced by FATF grey list decisions but is subject to Jersey’s own assessment process and timing.
  • Firms must therefore track both FATF grey list changes and actual updates to Jersey’s Schedule  and
  • must not assume that a FATF delisting automatically means the jurisdiction is immediately approved for the cannabis exemption in Jersey.

Key point for compliance teams:

  • South Africa was removed from the list in May 2023 after the FATF placed it under increased monitoring.
  • The FATF removed South Africa from increased monitoring in October 2025.
  • Jersey has taken approximately eight months to reinstate it. This is a material delay.

Action for compliance officers:

  • Treat this as a priority item. The combination of South Africa's re-addition and the clear 8-month implementation lag means firms must actively manage the transition date rather than assume automatic alignment with FATF decisions.
  • If you identify any exposure to non-listed jurisdictions, escalate immediately to your MLRO and consider obtaining specific legal advice on remediation.

Immediate actions required

1. Update policies, procedures and risk assessments (by 6 July 2026 at the latest)

  • Add South Africa to your list of approved jurisdictions for cannabis-related activity.
  • Update your:
    • Business Risk Assessment,
    • Customer Risk Assessments, and
    • any cannabis-specific policies.
  • Ensure staff training reflects the change.
  • Document the effective date clearly (pre-6 July vs post-6 July).

2. Conduct an urgent exposure review (recommended within 7–14 days).

Review all current, pipeline and historical relationships with any cannabis or cannabis-related exposure (direct or indirect). This must include:

  • Funds and investment managers with cannabis holdings or mandates
  • Clients or counterparties involved in cultivation, processing, distribution, or ancillary services
  • Indirect exposure through holding companies, SPVs, or supply chains
  • Any fees, carried interest, or distributions derived from cannabis activity

Map every jurisdiction involved against the current approved list.

  • The consolidated Order is available here: https://www.jerseylaw.je/laws/current/ro_87_2021.

Pay particular attention to any exposure to countries not on the approved list, including but not limited to:

  • South Africa (until 6 July 2026)
  • Any other jurisdiction that has ever been removed or was never included
  • Emerging cannabis markets (e.g. certain Latin American, African or Asian jurisdictions)

How a Jersey firm could be breaking the law – practical examples

Even where the underlying cannabis activity is lawful in the foreign jurisdiction, managing investments or business with exposure to a non-listed country can create serious criminal and regulatory exposure in Jersey.

  • Example 1 – Investment fund
    • A Jersey-regulated fund invests in a South African cannabis cultivator (lawful in South Africa).
    • Until 6 July 2026, the jurisdiction is not approved. The proceeds of that investment can be treated as criminal property in Jersey.
    • The fund, its manager, and any Jersey service providers could be dealing in criminal property (contrary to the Proceeds of Crime Law). This risk continues until the new Order takes effect.
  • Example 2 – Investment manager/adviser
    • A Jersey investment manager receives management fees or performance fees derived from a portfolio that includes cannabis assets in a non-approved jurisdiction.
    • Those fees can themselves become criminal property.
    • The firm and its MLRO may have failed to identify and report suspicion.
  • Example 3 – Bank or administrator
    • A Jersey bank or fund administrator processes subscriptions, redemptions or distributions linked to cannabis proceeds from a non-listed jurisdiction without applying enhanced due diligence or treating the relationship as higher risk.
    • This can amount to inadequate systems and controls and potential facilitation of money laundering.
  • Example 4 – Legacy or indirect exposure
    • A Jersey firm acquired a portfolio in 2022 that included cannabis exposure in a jurisdiction later removed from the list (or never added).
    • The firm has continued to manage or hold that exposure without reassessing the position after the 2023 removal or during the current gap.
    • This ongoing management can constitute repeated dealing in criminal property.
  • Example 5 – MLRO / compliance failure
    • The MLRO or compliance function becomes aware of cannabis-related exposure to a non-listed jurisdiction but does not escalate, conduct enhanced due diligence, or consider a SAR.
    • This can breach both the criminal law and the JFSC's Codes of Practice and AML Handbook requirements.

Recommended immediate compliance checklist

  • Full mapping of all cannabis-related exposure by jurisdiction (current + pipeline)
  • Gap analysis against the approved list
  • Update of all risk assessments and policies before 6 July 2026
  • Review of any fees or distributions received from cannabis activity in non-listed jurisdictions
  • Enhanced due diligence and senior management sign-off on any South African cannabis exposure until 6 July 2026
  • Training refresh for relevant teams
  • Board / MLRO report on findings and remediation plan

Sources  

JERSEY FATF MLRO

The Team

Meet the team of industry experts behind Comsure

Find out more

Latest News

Keep up to date with the very latest news from Comsure

Find out more

Gallery

View our latest imagery from our news and work

Find out more

Contact

Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us today

Get In Touch

News Disclaimer

As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[www.gov.UK/government/publications/copyright-acts-and-related-laws]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email info@comsuregroup.com.