Solid advice on “What makes a good Service Level Agreement [SLA]”
The article “What makes a good Service Level Agreement [SLA]” provides some simple tips for drafting effective SLAs.
What is a Service Level Agreement?
- A Service Level Agreement (or SLA) is the part of a contract which defines exactly what services a service provider will provide and the required level or standard for those services.
- The SLA is generally part of an outsourcing or managed services agreement or can be used in facilities management agreements and other agreements to provide services.
“What makes a good SLA”
- What should be included in an SLA?
- A properly drafted and well-thought-out SLA should have the following elements:
i. It will state the business objectives for providing the services.
ii. It will describe the service deliverables in detail.
iii. It will define the performance standards the customer expects in the service provider's provision of services.
iv. It will provide an ongoing reporting mechanism for measuring the expected performance standards.
v. It will provide a remedial mechanism and compensation regime where performance standards are not achieved whilst incentivising the service provider to maintain a high level of performance.
vi. It will provide a mechanism for review and change to the service levels throughout the contract.
- Ultimately, it will give the customer the right to terminate the contract where performance standards fall consistently below an acceptable level.
The main elements of a good SLA.
- Overall objectives
- The SLA should set out the overall objectives for the services to be provided.
- For example, if the purpose of having an external provider is to improve performance, save costs, or provide access to skills and/or technologies that cannot be provided internally, then the SLA should say so.
- This will help the customer craft the service levels to meet these objectives and should leave the service provider confident about what is required and why.
- Description of the Services
- The SLA should include a detailed description of the services.
- Each service should be defined, i.e. there should be a description of the service, where it is to be provided, to whom it is to be delivered and when it is required.
- For example, if one of the services is the delivery of a specific report, the relevant provision of the SLA should describe the report, state what it should include, state its format (perhaps referring to a particular template), how it is to be delivered (e.g. by email), to whom, when and at what frequency (e.g. to the finance team daily by 10 am each weekday morning).
- Performance Standards
- Then, taking each service in turn, the customer should state the expected performance standards. This will vary depending on the service. Using the “reporting” example above, a possible service level could be 99.5%.
- However, this has to be considered carefully. Often, a customer will want performance standards at the highest level. Whilst understandable, this is impossible, unnecessary or very expensive to achieve in practice.
- On the other hand, the service provider may well argue that service levels should be deliberately low to guarantee that the service can be provided at a competitive price.
- It is all a matter of judgment, and the customer will need to consider each service level carefully – it is often the case that individual services will be weighted differently depending on their business importance. Performance standards for the availability of an online service are generally high as the customer needs to ensure constant availability. Other individual services may be less critical, and the service levels can be set at a lower level.
- The service provider and the customer will also need to set these performance standards in the context of anticipated workloads, and the service levels may need to vary in light of any changes to these workloads during the contract. All this can be built into the SLA so that the cost implications of a shift in workload can be factored in.
- Compensation/Service Credits
- For the SLA to have any “bite”, failure to achieve the service levels must have a financial consequence for the service provider. This is most often achieved through the inclusion of a service credit regime.
- In essence, where the service provider fails to achieve the agreed performance standards, the service provider will pay or credit the customer an agreed amount, which should act as an incentive for improved performance.
- These service credits can be measured in several ways. For example,
i. If the 99.5% level for reporting is not achieved, the SLA could include a service credit that a specified reduction in price is given for each 0.5% shortfall in performance each week.
ii. Alternatively, service credits can be given where there are three or more failures to meet a service level in any specified period.
- Again, each service level needs to be looked at individually, and a sensible level of credit is agreed upon between the service provider and the customer for failure to achieve the agreed level over a specified period. It is essential to ensure that the service credits are reasonable, incentivise the service provider to do better, and kick in early enough to make a difference.
- Critical Failure
- Service credits help the service provider improve its performance, but what happens when service performance falls well below the expected level?
- If the SLA only included a service credit regime, then unless the service provided was so bad as to constitute a material breach of the contract as a whole, the customer could find itself in the position of having to pay (albeit at a reduced rate) for unsatisfactory overall performance. The solution is to include a right for the customer to terminate the agreement if service delivery becomes unacceptably bad.
- So the SLA should include a level of critical service level failure, below which the service provider has this termination right (and the right to sue for damages).
- For example, if service credits kick in if a service level failure has occurred twice in a particular period, the SLA could state that the customer has the right to terminate the agreement for material breach if the service level has not been achieved, say, eight times in the same period.
- Again, as with service credits, each service level has to be looked at individually and weighted according to business importance.
- With an online service, the availability of that service is crucial, so you might expect the right to terminate to arise earlier than for a failure to provide routine reports on time. In addition, the SLA could group certain service levels to calculate service credits and the right to terminate for critical failure; SLAs sometimes include aggregate point scoring systems for these purposes.
Other SLA provisions
- Whilst service levels, service credits, and the right to terminate are the main provisions in a Service Level Agreement, depending on the structure of the entire agreement, an SLA can include other matters, such as the following:
- Changes to pricing
i. Pricing may need to vary depending on a number of factors, and the SLA may, therefore, include a pricing review mechanism or provisions dealing with the sharing of cost savings.
- Contract Management
i. In longer-term contracts, the parties will need to keep the performance of the services under review. Provisions dealing with reporting, meetings, information provision and escalation procedures for disputes are sometimes included in the SLA rather than in the main body of the agreement. Unfortunately, these provisions are often overlooked, but for a contract for services to be successful, contract management procedures must be agreed upon and followed.
- Change Control
i. Often, the SLA will include a change control procedure, which sets out a mechanism for agreeing and recording changes to the agreement or the services provided. In a deal of any length or complexity, changes will inevitably be made to the services (which will have a knock-on effect on the service levels), and an agreed and properly implemented change control procedure is vital.
- Many Service Level Agreements leave a lot to be desired and must provide the customer's protection. Here are some of the more common mistakes:
- Don’t let the service provider draft the service level agreement. Customers need to decide what services must be provided, how they will be provided, when, where and to whom.
- Do not allow the service level agreement to become a marketing document. This can happen when the service provider prepares the SLA. In such a situation, the first draft of the SLA contains large chunks of material taken from marketing documents, which only provide a high-level overview of the services without any detail. These statements are often not measurable and, therefore, difficult to enforce. Subjectivity should be kept to a minimum.
- Wait to leave the Service Level Agreement preparation until the last minute. The SLA should take priority and be worked up at the start of the process. A last-minute introduction of a strict SLA might lead your service provider to revise their pricing upwards.
- Do not aim for absolute perfection. Instead, could you prioritise which service levels are most important? When drafting, do not expect an unrealistically high level of service performance as this may (a) not be necessary and (b) lead to an increase in the price. There must be enough in the contract for the service provider; otherwise, the relationship will not work from the outset. Remember that the best outcome is a long-lasting and mutually beneficial relationship with the service provider.
- Don’t overdo it! Remember that someone from the customer side needs to monitor service levels and compliance by the service provider. If you include too many detailed service levels which you cannot effectively monitor (due to a lack of people/expertise, etc.), then the efficacy of the SLA is reduced.
- Don’t have service levels without a compensation regime of some sort. Include service credits: there must be an incentive for the service provider to do better.
- Don’t have overly long service level measurement periods. Contracts, where performance is measured over several months before any right to service credits arises, may lead to the customer having to put up with a sub-standard performance for an extended period without any right to a remedy under the agreement.
- Take care if you want to base service levels with an external service provider on non-binding internal service levels. Sometimes, organisations have internal service levels that are not legally enforceable but are used as a guideline for the expected level of service to be provided by one part of an organisation to another (e.g. the IT or HR function). Don’t be tempted to apply these to an external service provider without consideration, particularly of the business objectives for the services.
- Don’t lose sight of your objectives. Ensure the service levels reflect the overall objectives of the contract. If the overwhelming business objective is to save money, ensure that the service levels are focused on achieving this.
- Always include a right to terminate for critical failure and define carefully what “critical failure” actually means. You might not want to use this right, but if service performance is poor, you will be glad you have it in the contract.
- Putting together an SLA can be a complicated process – it often involves documenting processes that have previously arisen organically within an organisation. But suppose you keep your business objectives in mind and follow the tips in this article. In that case, any SLA you produce should enhance the business relationship with your service provider and help you receive the service you expect.
Meet the team of industry experts behind ComsureFind out more
Keep up to date with the very latest news from ComsureFind out more
View our latest imagery from our news and workFind out more
Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us todayGet In Touch
As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[www.gov.UK/government/publications/copyright-acts-and-related-laws]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email email@example.com.