News
Print Article

Singapore’s First Corporate Deferred Prosecution Agreement to Resolve Brazil Corruption Allegations

28/04/2026

Singapore High Court Approves Country’s First Corporate Deferred Prosecution Agreement: Seatrium to Pay Net US$57 Million to Resolve Brazil Corruption Allegations

It has been reported.

  • In a landmark development for corporate accountability in Singapore, the High Court has approved the nation’s first Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA) involving a corporate entity.
  • Offshore and marine engineering giant Seatrium Limited will avoid criminal prosecution over corruption offences linked to Brazil in exchange for a substantial financial penalty and enhanced compliance measures.
  • Under the terms of the DPA, signed with Singapore’s Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) on 30 July 2025, Seatrium must pay a financial penalty of US$110 million.
    • Up to US$53 million of payments already made to Brazilian authorities in connection with the same case can be credited against this amount,
    • Resulting in a net payment of US$57 million (approximately S$73.3 million) to Singapore authorities.
  • High Court Justice Hoo Sheau Peng approved the DPA in a private hearing on 24 April 2026, confirming that the agreement is in the interests of justice and that its terms are fair, reasonable, and proportionate.
  • There are no changes to the original terms agreed with the Public Prosecutor.
  • This resolution provides finality for Seatrium while underscoring Singapore’s commitment to combating cross-border corruption through innovative legal tools like the DPA.

Background: Operation Car Wash and Long-Running Investigations

  • The case stems from Brazil’s massive “Operation Car Wash” (Operação Lava Jato) corruption scandal, which erupted in 2014 and exposed a vast network of bribes involving executives and politicians to secure lucrative contracts with state-owned oil giant Petrobras.
  • Seatrium (formerly Sembcorp Marine) faced allegations of improper payments to Brazilian officials to win offshore rig-building projects.
  • Singapore authorities launched their own probes in 2023.
  • The Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) investigated Seatrium and individuals for corruption offences. At the same time, a joint probe by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) and the Commercial Affairs Department examined potential breaches of securities law.
  • In March 2024, two former Seatrium executives — including a former CEO — were separately charged with bribery involving more than S$20 million.
  • The securities investigation later concluded with no further action against the company or its officers.
  • Seatrium also reached leniency agreements with Brazilian authorities, agreeing to pay approximately BRL 728.9 million (around S$168.4 million) to settle related claims.

Terms of the DPA and Company Impact

  • Beyond the financial penalty, Seatrium is required to review and strengthen its ethics and compliance programme to reduce the risk of similar conduct recurring.
  • The company has already made provisions for the net US$57 million payment in its FY2025 financial statements, stating there will be “no material impact on the net earnings and net tangible asset per share of the Group for the financial year ending 31 December 2026.”
  • If Seatrium breaches any terms of the DPA, the Public Prosecutor can apply to the High Court to terminate the agreement and pursue criminal proceedings.
  • In a bourse filing on 24 April 2026, Seatrium confirmed the High Court approval and noted that the resolution brings closure to the long-running matter. Shares in the company rose modestly following the announcement.

Significance for Singapore’s Corporate Governance Landscape

  • This marks the first time a DPA has been approved by a Singapore court for a corporate entity, highlighting the growing use of such agreements as an alternative to full prosecution for companies that cooperate with authorities.
  • DPAs allow firms to avoid a criminal conviction, which can have severe reputational and business consequences, while still imposing significant penalties and requiring robust remedial actions.
  • Legal observers see the Seatrium case as a milestone that could encourage more companies to self-report and remediate misconduct, reinforcing Singapore’s position as a clean business hub while maintaining strong anti-corruption enforcement.
  • Seatrium, a premier global player in the offshore and marine sector, has stated that it has put in place robust policies and procedures to uphold the highest standards of ethics and compliance.

Sources  

CORRUPTION LEGAL

The Team

Meet the team of industry experts behind Comsure

Find out more

Latest News

Keep up to date with the very latest news from Comsure

Find out more

Gallery

View our latest imagery from our news and work

Find out more

Contact

Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us today

Get In Touch

News Disclaimer

As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[www.gov.UK/government/publications/copyright-acts-and-related-laws]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email info@comsuregroup.com.