Singapore prosecutes ex BP executive for bribery and now faces money laundering trial……!!!!!
A former director of BP’s marine fuels business in Singapore and a businessman were each sentenced to 4½ years’ jail yesterday for their roles in a private sector bribery case.
In Singapore, an ex-BP employee, Clarence Chang Peng Hong was jailed for 54 months and ordered to pay a penalty of about S$6.22 million for taking bribes from another company.
Chang, who was BP’s former eastern regional director for marine fuels, had accepted bribes from businessman Koh Seng Lee, on 19 occasions in exchange for advancing the business interests of Koh’s company with BP.
Koh had set up a marine fuel trading company, Pacific Prime Trading (PPT), based on Chang’s request. The two had a mutual understanding from the start that Chang would use his position in BP Singapore to advance PPT’s interest, in return for a share of PPT’s profits.
Koh had also agreed to invest $500,000 in a pre-school – Mindchamps Preschool @ City Square – where Chang’s wife was a director.
According to the prosecution, Koh knew Chang had the power to “make or break” PPT, and felt pressured to accept Chang’s requests for payments.
Chang is also separately facing money laundering charges.
Chang was also charged with converting S$111,000 worth of corrupt proceeds to acquire share capital in the pre-school.
The money laundering charges were stood down for the purpose of the corruption trial and will be dealt with subsequently, said CPIB.
Chang is also alleged to have converted nearly S$4M to buy 3 private landed properties and two condominium apartments. That amount is alleged to be wholly or partially the direct or indirect benefits of corrupt proceeds.
The alleged charges concern the transfer of almost S$4.7M worth of corrupt proceeds from an HSBC bank account in Hong Kong to a POSB account and two other HSBC accounts in Singapore.
Countries around the world have in recent years sternly condemned the bribery of government officials, calling it harmful to development, an unfair business practice, and morally reprehensible.
Assuming that bribery distorts markets, misallocates public funds, and results in the delivery of inferior products and services, all of these descriptions apply equally well to bribery of a private, non-governmental individual.
There appears to be a growing international consensus against private sector bribery, suggesting that companies should expand their international compliance programs to aggressively prohibit commercial bribery as well as bribery of government officials.
“To avoid falling victim to dishonest practices by rogue employees seeking personal gains, companies are strongly advised to put in place robust procedures in areas such as procurement and internal audit,” said CPIB in Singapore.
- Companies can refer to CPIB’s guidance on measures to prevent corruption,
- And are strongly encouraged to obtain certification on anti-bribery management systems, said the bureau.
Meet the team of industry experts behind ComsureFind out more
Keep up to date with the very latest news from ComsureFind out more
View our latest imagery from our news and workFind out more
Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us todayGet In Touch
As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[www.gov.UK/government/publications/copyright-acts-and-related-laws]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email email@example.com.