Print Article

SIGNATURE BANK investigated for money laundering failures……?


Two United States government bodies were reportedly investigating the cryptocurrency-friendly Signature Bank before its collapse.

According to a March 15 Bloomberg report citing people familiar with the matter, investigators with the Justice Department were examining whether Signature took adequate measures to detect potential money laundering by its clients.

It is noted that the regulator was particularly concerned about whether the bank was taking pre-emptive measures to monitor transactions for "signs of criminality" and properly vetting account holders.

A separate probe by the Securities and Exchange Commission was also "taking a look" at the bank, according to two anonymous sources quoted by Bloomberg.

It's unclear when the investigations began and what effect, if any, they had on the recent decision by New York state regulators to close the bank.

It's reported Signature, and its staff are not accused of wrongdoing. The investigations may be finalized without any charges or further action by the SEC or the Department of Justice (DOJ).

The report comes after a March 14 class action lawsuit by Signature shareholders filed against the bank and former executives for claiming to be "financially strong" only three days before it was forcibly shuttered.

on March 13, Barney Frank, a former board member of Signature Bank, said the regulators wanted

Frank added the crypto-friendly bank became the "poster boy," as there was "no insolvency based on the fundamentals."

Signature, closed on March 12, was part of a series of bank closures that included Silvergate Capital and Silicon Valley Bank (SVB).

The DOJ and the SEC have reportedly since initiated separate investigations into the collapse of Silvergate Capital and SVB.

It's reported that the regulators will examine the events leading up to the bank's collapse, including

  • Scrutinizing security filings that disclosed the sale of SVB shares by the firm's CEO Greg Becker and CFO Daniel Beck that took place two weeks before its downfall.

The SEC has not formally commented on the matters, but SEC chair Gary Gensler said on March 12 that it



The Team

Meet the team of industry experts behind Comsure

Find out more

Latest News

Keep up to date with the very latest news from Comsure

Find out more


View our latest imagery from our news and work

Find out more


Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us today

Get In Touch

News Disclaimer

As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email