News
Print Article

Shadowy U.K. and Singapore Firms Won Over $200 Million in Uzbek Mining Tenders.

08/02/2026

Trust structures allow tens of millions of dollars from the Uzbek state budget flowed to a British firm whose ultimate owners are completely hidden from the public.

HOW

Until a few months ago, 71-year-old British accountant Wendy Conroy looked like an improbable success in the world of Central Asian mining.

Her company, Lemixton Solutions, registered in East London, had won contracts worth more than $22 million from a major state enterprise in Uzbekistan to supply it with goods like steel pipes and aluminium sheets.

But something was odd: Lemixton has no website, just one employee, and no identifiable Uzbek office. And since 2021, the company has consistently filed dormant accounts — a status reserved for firms that have no significant financial transactions.

In fact, of course, Ms Conroy had nothing to do with this business.

  • Her closest link to it is that her son was the founder of the registration agent that managed its paperwork.
  • She was just a proxy.

That became clear when reporters contacted Ms Conroy for comment. In a matter of weeks, a flurry of updated filings changed the persons “with significant control” listed for the company:

  • First to a prominent Uzbek ping-pong official,
  • Then to a Colombian man.

Both had their respective tenures backdated to 2018. The new filings also reveal that the firm’s ownership involves a trust arrangement: The mysterious Colombian man may also not be its ultimate beneficiary.

WHAT WE LEARN

  • The story shows that — for all the reforms that the British corporate registry Companies House has undergone in recent years — almost total opacity is still possible.
  • Those reforms are real. In 2023, a major piece of legislation, the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act, promised to turn Companies House from a passive collector of information into an active gatekeeper.
  • Company officials now face mandatory ID verification, and the agency has new powers to check and remove bad information.
  • But this story reveals the numerous remaining gaps.
  • Trusts have emerged as a weak point in previous reporting, and while new ID requirements may help ensure real people are registered as “persons with significant control,” these people don’t necessarily
  • represent a company’s true owners — as the case of Wendy Conroy shows.
  • The downstream effect is that, halfway across the world, tens of millions of dollars from the Uzbek state budget flowed to a British firm whose ultimate owners are completely hidden from the public.
  • This leaves space for anyone who can afford to hire professional company administrators to take advantage.

Read the full story →

https://tinyurl.com/5xbccwnk

https://www.occrp.org/en/investigation/uzbek-state-crown-jewel-hands-200m-in-tenders-to-secretive-foreign-firms?utm_source=OCCRP&utm_campaign=38ce97841d-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2026_02_06_07_35&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_-38ce97841d-1210517204

 

UNITED KINGDOM FRAUD LEGAL PEPs

The Team

Meet the team of industry experts behind Comsure

Find out more

Latest News

Keep up to date with the very latest news from Comsure

Find out more

Gallery

View our latest imagery from our news and work

Find out more

Contact

Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us today

Get In Touch

News Disclaimer

As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[www.gov.UK/government/publications/copyright-acts-and-related-laws]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email info@comsuregroup.com.