Print Article

SFO Wants Companies to Invest in Compliance


The U.K.'s Financial Crimes Agency Wants Companies to Invest in Compliance - Two cases with diverging outcomes illustrate the value of a strong compliance program, the Serious Fraud Office director.

The U.K.'s major economic crimes investigative agency has taken steps to emphasize the need for companies to invest in programs and procedures designed to prevent wrongdoing, its director said on Tuesday.

The focus on the strength of companies' compliance programs is a new one for the Serious Fraud Office.

SFO Director Lisa Osofsky said at a Society of Corporate Compliance & Ethics conference.

  • "The emphasis we place on it today is significantly stronger than it was when the agency was born" in the late 1980s,

Ms. Osofsky, offered additional guidance on evaluating compliance programs - Ms. Osofsky asked COMPLIANCE PRACTITIONERS during an online speech.

  • "Are they part of the company's DNA?"
  • "Or do they just adorn a very nice couple of binders that are held on a bookshelf that don't really do much more than provide window-dressing?"

The agency can credit companies with strong compliance programs by negotiating more lenient settlements with them.

Ms. Osofsky pointed to two cases with divergent outcomes that she said showed the SFO's commitment to doing so. The SFO in

  • July 2019 struck a £19.2 million ($24 million) deal with a subsidiary of public contractor Serco Group PLC.
  • 2020 A year later, it reached a similar settlement with security-services company G4S PLC, which agreed to pay £38.5 million ($48.6 million).

Both cases involved allegations of fraud in connection with contracts to provide electronic-monitoring services to the U.K.'s Ministry of Justice. The offenses occurred between 2010 and 2013, according to the agreements.

Ms. Osofsky said.

  • Serco reported the misconduct and began cooperating with the SFO early, and was rewarded with a faster and less expensive resolution,
  • G4S took substantially longer to cooperate and received a smaller discount, she said.

The state of each companies' compliance programs played a role in the outcomes, Ms. Osofsky said.

  • "G4S was in a different place in its compliance journey,"
  • "It hadn't yet embedded and thought through its compliance obligations in a way that Serco could demonstrate to us it had."

Spokespersons for G4S and Serco declined to comment on Ms. Osofsky's remarks.

In a first for the SFO, the G4S settlement also contained a provision requiring the appointment of a reviewer to ensure the company adhered to its agreement with the agency.

Ms. Osofsky said.

  • "It is the first time we use such a construct to oversight the compliance development and compliance markers,"

Under U.K. law, the arrangement is distinct from the so-called independent monitors used in the U.S. to ensure compliance with settlement agreements, she added.

Building on the principles released last year, the SFO will continue to deepen its understanding of compliance and engagement with compliance professionals, Ms. Osofsky said.

  • "We're upskilling ourselves to be better and smarter in this evaluation, including bringing in people with experience and expertise in this area," she said.



The Team

Meet the team of industry experts behind Comsure

Find out more

Latest News

Keep up to date with the very latest news from Comsure

Find out more


View our latest imagery from our news and work

Find out more


Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us today

Get In Touch

News Disclaimer

As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email