Santander ditched EY as a financial crime consultant over alleged failings.
According to three people who know the matter, EY agreed to terminate a consulting contract and refund millions of pounds to Santander’s UK business after failings in its anti-financial crime work for the bank.
According to two of the people:-
- The Big Four consultancy was one of several external advisers called on by Santander as it attempted to address financial crime and anti-money laundering systems that had drawn scrutiny from regulators.
- The quality of work performed by EY was so poor that the professional services giant was forced this year to refund the bank about £15mn for the project.
said one of the people.
- The work, codenamed Project Morgan, “went badly wrong over an extended period,” and
- The financial settlement dented the results of the consultancy’s UK financial services division for its most recent financial year, which ended in June,
The amount refunded to Santander is equivalent to the annual pay of about 19 of EY’s UK partners, who were each paid an average of £803,000 in the 12 months to June 2022, the most recent year for which it has published financial results.
It is still being determined whether the work was brought in-house by Santander or handed to another firm.
IN DECEMBER, the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority fined Santander £108mn, one of its largest penalties for anti-money laundering processes, for failings between 2012 and 2017.
- It had invested more than £700mn over the past five years in a programme to transform its financial crime systems.
- “We need to keep pace with technological change, which involves piloting new platforms and processes to ensure we are complying with best practices and continuing to innovate,”
EY declined to comment.
Meet the team of industry experts behind ComsureFind out more
Keep up to date with the very latest news from ComsureFind out more
View our latest imagery from our news and workFind out more
Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us todayGet In Touch
As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[www.gov.UK/government/publications/copyright-acts-and-related-laws]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email firstname.lastname@example.org.