Print Article

Regulator could lose immunity from civil damages lawsuits


Currently, the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 gives the FCA and Prudential Regulation Authority immunity from civil liability damages arising through negligence.

The FCA will be liable to civil damages actions if an amendment tabled by MPs to abolish the regulator’s longstanding statutory immunity is passed, Citywire New Model Adviser [NMA] has learned.

The door could open to lawsuits brought against the FCA and could mean claims management firms bring forward a flood of claims, one source said.

The Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 gives the FCA and Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) statutory immunity from civil liability legal cases, which means they do not have to pay damages arising from negligence.

The regulators’ immunity

  • Does not extend, however, to claims for bad faith or for contraventions of the Human Rights Act 1998,
  • Nor does it prevent claims for judicial review of their decisions or challenges in the Financial Services Tribunal in regard to regulatory actions.

NMA has learned that a group of Scottish National Party MPs tabled an amendment clause to the financial services and markets bill that could strip the FCA and PRA of their immunity from civil cases.

Under the amendment, the watchdogs will be subject to civil damages actions if a consumer has suffered financial loss and the regulators negligently failed to take sufficient action to prevent the prohibited activity from occurring.

The amendment, which still needs to pass the committee stage, was first proposed by campaign action group Transparency Task Force.

After the committee stage, the bill will have a third reading in parliament before receiving royal assent. NMA understands the Treasury is expecting the entire bill to pass by next April.

A source told NMA that if the FCA loses its immunity, claims management companies could bring many negligence cases against it over past incidences.

The amendment does not outline how the FCA will pay for the legal costs or civil cases that go against it, but options include a levy on firms.

In recent years, the FCA has been accused of failing to stop a series of scandals, including London Capital & Finance, the British Steel Pension Scheme, and Blackmore Bond, all of which caused investors to lose millions of pounds.

Simon Harrington, head of public affairs at the Personal Investment Management & Financial Advice Association, said:

  • ‘While we absolutely understand the provenance of the proposed amendment and recognise the very real harm that has been perpetuated as a result of unregulated firms in particular, it would be extremely concerning to us if these costs were ultimately borne by existing industry participants.
  • ‘The cost of regulation and additional compensation through funding the Financial Services Compensation Scheme is already a significant burden for many firms in this industry, and this would add an additional layer to well-run firms.’

The FCA declined to comment.


The Team

Meet the team of industry experts behind Comsure

Find out more

Latest News

Keep up to date with the very latest news from Comsure

Find out more


View our latest imagery from our news and work

Find out more


Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us today

Get In Touch

News Disclaimer

As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email