Print Article

No proceeds of crime? But you should have been suspicious! the legal duty to report ML in the UK


On 2 June, the CPS updated their guidance on when and how to prosecute money laundering offences.

The most significant change that they have made in their guidance is about section 330 of POCA

  • They will now follow a Scots Law decision called Ahmad v HM Advocate [2009] HCJAC 60.
  • Before this change, the CPS had interpreted the law differently following the House of Lords’ decision in R v Montila [2004] 1WLR 314The CPS will apply this change of position to any case where the failure to report a money laundering suspicion occurred on or after 2 June 2021.

The upshot of this change of position is that:

  • The CPS now considers that any person who fails to report a suspicion of money laundering will not be able to rely on a defence that, despite failing to report a suspicion, it turns out that there was no underlying money laundering offence that took place.

Or, to put it another way:

  • A mere failure to report a suspicion of money laundering or indeed a failure to report when reasonable grounds to suspect exist will render a person liable to prosecution and conviction.
  • Subject only to another defence, e.g. that the material was privileged within the meaning of s 330.

This is a really big change and I think it will lead to an increase in the numbers of prosecutions for failing to report under s 330.


The Team

Meet the team of industry experts behind Comsure

Find out more

Latest News

Keep up to date with the very latest news from Comsure

Find out more


View our latest imagery from our news and work

Find out more


Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us today

Get In Touch

News Disclaimer

As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email