News
Print Article

NCA Amber Alert Exposes Shadow Fleets Driving Sanctions Evasion

25/11/2025

The UK’s National Crime Agency (NCA) has issued a high‑level Amber Alert warning financial institutions and maritime operators about the growing threat posed by “shadow fleets” and covert networks that enable sanctioned regimes such as Russia, Iran, and North Korea to evade restrictions and generate billions in illicit revenue.

Amber Alert: Networks & Shadow Fleets

The alert, published by the National Economic Crime Centre (NECC) in partnership with the Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI) and the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO), highlights how sanctions evasion networks exploit opaque corporate structures, deceptive maritime practices, and covert financial systems.

Investigators estimate that 700–1000 ageing vessels form part of these shadow fleets, routinely renamed, reflagged, and re‑insured via shell companies to disguise their true ownership and purpose. In 2025 alone, over 180 vessels and enablers were designated by sanctioning authorities, disrupting revenue streams that directly fund military and nuclear programmes.

Global Context

  • Russia: Despite sanctions, Russia generated USD 120.5 billion in energy revenues in 2024, nearly 30% of state income. EU officials have described the shadow fleet as a “financial pillar” of Moscow’s war effort【Al Jazeera, July 2025】【United24 Media, Nov 2025】.
  • Iran: The US Treasury has repeatedly sanctioned Iranian‑linked front companies and vessels, warning that Iran’s “dark fleet” of over 300 tankers is central to its sanctions evasion strategy【US Treasury, Dec 2024】【Jerusalem Post, Nov 2025】.
  • North Korea: DPRK continues to rely on covert maritime transfers and falsified documentation to fund weapons development, often using Russian and Iranian networks as facilitators【RUSI Insight Paper, Sept 2025】.

Compliance Risks

The NCA warns of several typologies that compliance teams should treat as red flags:

  • Maritime deception: disabling AIS transponders, falsifying cargo documentation, and ship‑to‑ship transfers.
  • Front companies: rapid incorporation in permissive jurisdictions, often with misleading websites or proxy ownership.
  • Financial laundering: offshore shells, barter trade, cryptocurrency, and complex routing through weak AML jurisdictions.

Implications for Risk Management

Th Amber Alert underscores the need to:

  • Strengthen due diligence on maritime clients, commodity traders, and shipping intermediaries.
  • Enhance transaction monitoring for crypto and third‑party payments linked to high‑risk jurisdictions.
  • Integrate maritime intelligence into financial crime frameworks.
  • Report suspicious activity to the NCA SAR Portal and OFSI, referencing Amber Alert code 0788‑NECC.

Key Findings

  • The UK’s National Crime Agency (NCA), together with OFSI and the FCDO, issued an Amber Alert in November 2025 warning of sanctions evasion networks and shadow fleets.
  • These networks are linked to Russia, Iran, and North Korea, exploiting opaque corporate structures, deceptive maritime practices, and covert financial channels.
  • The shadow fleet comprises an estimated 700–1000 ageing vessels, routinely renamed, reflagged, and re‑insured via shell entities, enabling illicit transport of oil and gas.
  • In 2025, over 180 vessels and enablers were designated by sanctioning authorities, disrupting revenue streams for sanctioned regimes.

Global Context

  • Russia: The shadow fleet is central to Moscow’s sanctions evasion, helping generate USD 120.5bn in energy revenues in 2024 despite restrictions. The EU and France have pledged stronger action against these fleets, calling them a “financial pillar” of Russia’s war effort.
  • Iran: Iran’s “dark fleet” has expanded to 320+ tankers, moving oil through ghost fleets, offshore shells, and crypto exchanges. The US Treasury and State Department have sanctioned multiple entities and vessels involved in deceptive shipping practices.
  • North Korea (DPRK): DPRK continues to use covert maritime networks to fund weapons programs, often through ship‑to‑ship transfers and false documentation.

Compliance Risks

  • Maritime deception: Disabling AIS transponders, falsifying cargo documentation, and ship‑to‑ship transfers to obscure cargo origin.
  • Front companies: Rapid incorporation in permissive jurisdictions, often with misleading websites, dubious addresses, or proxy ownership.
  • Financial laundering: Use of offshore shells, barter, cryptocurrency, and complex routing through weak AML jurisdictions.
  • Geopolitical exposure: Revenues from shadow fleets directly fund Russia’s war in Ukraine, Iran’s nuclear program, and DPRK’s weapons development.

Lessons for Risk Officers

  • Monitor for red flags: sudden vessel reflagging, inconsistent cargo documentation, rapid commercial expansion without track record, or suspicious payment arrangements.
  • Strengthen due diligence on maritime clients, commodity traders, and shipping intermediaries.
  • Enhance transaction monitoring for crypto, barter, and third‑party payments linked to high‑risk jurisdictions.
  • Pay attention to front company typologies: meaningless names, prestigious office addresses without operations, or politically exposed persons using proxies.

Sources

UNITED KINGDOM SANCTIONS

The Team

Meet the team of industry experts behind Comsure

Find out more

Latest News

Keep up to date with the very latest news from Comsure

Find out more

Gallery

View our latest imagery from our news and work

Find out more

Contact

Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us today

Get In Touch

News Disclaimer

As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[www.gov.UK/government/publications/copyright-acts-and-related-laws]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email info@comsuregroup.com.