
May 30, 2025 - Ex-Goldman banker Leissner sentenced to ONLY two years in prison in 1MDB case
30/05/2025
The sentencing of Tim Leissner marks a significant moment in the 1MDB scandal, highlighting the severe repercussions of financial misconduct. His two-year prison sentence serves as a stark reminder to the global finance community about the importance of robust compliance and anti-money laundering measures.
The 1MDB affair, involving $4.5 billion, has had far-reaching impacts, emphasizing the need for vigilance and integrity in financial operations. It's a cautionary tale for executives and institutions alike.
Tim Leissner faced several serious charges in connection with the 1MDB scandal. He pleaded guilty to:
- Conspiracy to violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA): This involved bribing officials to secure business advantages.
- Money laundering conspiracy: This included the movement of illicit funds through various financial systems
These charges were part of his role in the scheme that saw billions of dollars misappropriated from Malaysia's sovereign wealth fund, 1MDB
The 1MDB scandal had significant repercussions for Goldman Sachs:
- Financial Penalties: Goldman Sachs agreed to pay nearly $3 billion to settle investigations into its role in the scandal. This included fines and compensation clawbacks from executives.
- Reputation Damage: The scandal severely tarnished Goldman Sachs' reputation, highlighting failures in compliance and oversight.
- Legal Consequences: The bank's Malaysian subsidiary pleaded guilty in U.S. court, marking the only criminal case filed against Goldman in its 156-year history.
What has been said
WASHINGTON, D.C.—Dennis Kelleher, Cofounder, President, and CEO of Better Markets, issued the following statement on the sentencing of Tim Leissner today in United States v. Leissner, 18-CR-439 (E.D.N.Y.):
- “The good news is that the Goldman Sachs partner who orchestrated and led the bank’s central involvement in the 1MDB scandal is going to prison.
- The bad news is that he faced 25 years in prison and deserved more than just two (as detailed here). Goldman and Leissner’s crimes weren’t just financial, even though their looting of $4.5 billion from a Malaysian Wealth fund was one of the greatest financial heists in history.
- They undermined democracy in an entire country, which enabled a corrupt prime minister to stay in power for five years and to crush his opponents, during which a prosecutor was butchered.
- While no sentence would likely really serve justice, a two-year prison sentence is certainly well below what the facts and the law warrant here.
- “Unfortunately, Judge Margo Brodie, in handing down the prison sentence, reportedly relied in part on a letter from Goldman Sachs saying that ‘the 1MDB fraud would never have taken place without Leissner.’
- While that is true, more than 30 Goldman Sachs executives and supervisors were involved with 1MDB, including its then-CEO and its now-CEO.
- The 1MDB fraud would never have happened if Goldman Sachs hadn’t committed crimes, if it hadn’t installed a minimally effective compliance system, if management hadn’t overridden or ignored the compliance department objections, or if the bank hadn’t turned a blind eye to the many red flags indicating that there were innumerable irregularities if not fraud happening under the noses of the supposedly smartest bankers in the world.
- Goldman pocketed the extraordinary fee of $600 million for a few months’ work placing de facto sovereign bonds, which clearly blinded them to what should have been obvious illegal conduct. Judge Margo Brodie should have said that ‘the 1MDB fraud would never have taken place without Goldman Sachs’ conduct which included enabling Leissner to engage in his criminal conduct.’
- “Leissner’s lawyers’ reported comments in court about Goldman’s letter that Judge Brodie referred to are on point: they come from an ‘institution continuing to resist responsibility for its central role’ in the scandal. ‘It’s sort of like a getaway driver showing up at a cooperator’s sentencing.’
- “Finally, while Leissner cooperated with prosecutors, he decided to cooperate only after he was caught, after he tipped off some of his co-conspirators (who remain fugitives), and after he failed in attempting to blame others.
- Moreover, once he flipped, Leissner helped prosecutors move down the corporate chain of authority, not up the chain of command as happens in virtually every other notable case.
- Testifying against a junior colleague who reported to you isn’t usually viewed as worthy of a reward. The result is that individual accountability at Goldman Sachs stopped at Leissner, and didn’t reach any of the other 30 Goldman Sachs executives or supervisors.
- “Goldman’s and Leissner’s acts were egregious, wilful, prolonged, and extraordinarily damaging, and all just based on unbounded greed.
- While some jail time is more meaningful than the get-out-of-jail free card Leissner was arguing for, it’s not commensurate with the gravity of the crimes Goldman and Leissner committed.
- Ultimately, it is minimal punishment and questionable if any deterrence, thereby undermining the twin goals of justice.”
References
its https://www.bbc.com/news/business-54597256
its Ex-Goldman banker Leissner sentenced to two years in prison in 1MDB case https://www.cnbc.com/2025/05/29/ex-goldman-banker-leissner-sentenced-to-two-years-in-prison-in-1mdb-case.html
its Ex-Goldman banker Leissner sentenced to two years in prison in 1MDB ... https://www.channelnewsasia.com/asia/new-york-malaysia-goldman-sachs-tim-leissner-prison-1mdb-5159391
its Tim Leissner Sentenced in 1MDB Scandal: Former Goldman Sachs Banker ... https://legal.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/tim-leissner-sentenced-in-1mdb-scandal-former-goldman-sachs-banker-faces-2-years-in-prison/121505377
The Team
Meet the team of industry experts behind Comsure
Find out moreLatest News
Keep up to date with the very latest news from Comsure
Find out moreGallery
View our latest imagery from our news and work
Find out moreContact
Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us today
Get In TouchNews Disclaimer
As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[www.gov.UK/government/publications/copyright-acts-and-related-laws]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email info@comsuregroup.com.