
MAURITIUS update on money laundering trial against the Son of the former police commissioner.
30/06/2025
The money laundering trial against Chandra Prakashsing Dip, son of former police commissioner Anil Kumar Dip, continued on Thursday, June 26, before the Financial Crimes Division (FCD), with the testimony of:
- Robert Seeruttun, acting Head of investigation at the Financial Crimes Commission (FCC).
- His testimony on the stand revealed a sophisticated network of embezzlement involving shell companies and transfers to relatives of the main accused.
- According to Robert Seeruttun's statements, Chandra Dip would have laundered a total amount of Rs 10 million. [£161K APPROX].
- Of this sum, Rs 1.5 million would have passed directly into his bank account. The rest was allegedly divided between the accounts of four people close to him, who were not involved in any commercial activity related to these funds.
The investigation shows that:
- The companies used for these transactions had been registered shortly before the events and had no real operational activity.
- These entities had no employees or infrastructure, and only served to channel bank deposits to the detriment of the defunct Bramer Banking Corporation Ltd.
- No legitimate business transactions were detected, other than fraudulent payments. Questioned by the representative of the office of the Director of Public Prosecutions, Robert Seeruttun revealed that Darmendra Mulloo, another major accused, would have laundered Rs 44 million alone, including Rs 19.5 million deposited in his account.
- He and Chandra Dip are presented as the main instigators of this operation.
Chandra Dip faces 15 counts of money laundering in connection with cashing several cheques issued by Yeschem Ltd, a company run at the time by her mother, Chandni Dip. The amounts collected, in the space of five months in 2011, total Rs 1,415,000.
- Darmendra Mulloo faces 156 charges, totalling more than Rs 18.5 million.
- Sheikh Mohammed Gaddafi Jany is being prosecuted for two suspicious transactions of Rs 310,000 and Rs 122,000,
- Muhammad Saif Ullah Maulaboksh is accused of laundering Rs 34.7 million on 15 separate counts.
All these crimes are said to have been committed between April and August 2011.
The four defendants have already pleaded guilty at a session preceding the June 26 session.
Muhammad Irfaan Hausmuddy, who is being tried separately, faces 35 counts of wire fraud, totalling more than Rs 57.5 million, and a charge of money laundering related to the purchase of a vehicle. He maintains his position of not guilty. The trial continues today, June 30, before the FCD.
SOURCE
The Team
Meet the team of industry experts behind Comsure
Find out moreLatest News
Keep up to date with the very latest news from Comsure
Find out moreGallery
View our latest imagery from our news and work
Find out moreContact
Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us today
Get In TouchNews Disclaimer
As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[www.gov.UK/government/publications/copyright-acts-and-related-laws]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email info@comsuregroup.com.