Print Article

Mauritian firm fined for AML failures (A LOOK BACK TO 2020)


In June 2020, the FSC conducted an on-site inspection at the premises of the PCL Management Services (Mauritius) Ltd (the “Company”), THE COMPNAY holds a Management Licence issued by the Financial Services Commission, Mauritius (the “FSC”) on 15 November 1994.

This inspection revealed that the Company was in breach of numerous statutory obligations:

  • A deficiency letter was thus issued to the Company detailing the on-site inspection findings and requiring the Company to submit an action plan to remedy the statutory breaches.
  • The Company responded to the deficiency letter and was required to submit periodic reports on the implementation of its remedial plan.
  • Notwithstanding the remedial plan, the matter was referred to the Enforcement Directorate of the FSC for such action, as it deems appropriate in relation to the contraventions revealed by the inspection.

Decision of the EC

  • In light of the above and based on the written representations of the Company, the EC has resolved to impose an AP amounting to USD 4,950 on the Company under sections 7(1) (c) (v) and 52(3) of the FSA.

Breaches committed by the Company

The EC observed that the following breaches of the Financial Intelligence and Anti[1]Money Laundering Act (the “FIAMLA”) and the Financial Intelligence and Anti-Money Laundering Regulations 2018 (the “FIAMLR”) were committed by the Company

  1. 2.1.1. Section 17 of the FIAMLA
    • The Company has contravened section 17 of the FIAMLA inasmuch as it has not undertaken a risk assessment to identify, assess and understand the money laundering and terrorism financing risks in relation to its business.
    • Such a policy document was subsequently submitted to the FSC on 08 June 2020 but during the Inspection, there was no evidence to support that the Company carried out the risk assessment.
  2. 2.1.2. Section 17A of the FIAMLA
    • In accordance with section 17A of the FIAMLA, the Company was required to establish policies, controls and procedures to mitigate and manage effectively the risks of money laundering and terrorism financing which it has identified in its risk assessment. In this regard, the Company has compiled a Compliance Procedures Manual.
    • However, as at the date of the Inspection, the Compliance Procedures Manual was not finalised and was not approved by the Company’s senior management thereby resulting in a breach of section 17A (2) of the FIAMLA.
    • However, the Compliance Procedures Manual was thereafter finalised and approved by the Company’s board on 10 August 2020.
  3. 2.1.3. Regulation 3 of the FIAMLR
    • As at the Inspection, the Company had infringed regulation 3 of the FIAMLR since it had failed to take reasonable measures to ascertain and verify the identity of the beneficial owner of [Edited for Confidentiality], one of its clients.
    • Nonetheless, post Inspection, the Company has endeavoured to update its clients-related Customer Due Diligence records.
  4. 2.1.4. Regulation 22(1) (d) of the FIAMLR
    • The Company infringed regulation 22(1) (d) of the FIAMLR by failing to implement an independent audit function to review and verify compliance with, and effectiveness of the measures that it has taken to maintain compliance with the FIAMLA and the FIAMLR



The Team

Meet the team of industry experts behind Comsure

Find out more

Latest News

Keep up to date with the very latest news from Comsure

Find out more


View our latest imagery from our news and work

Find out more


Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us today

Get In Touch

News Disclaimer

As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email