Lawyers remain laggards in adopting money laundering risk assessment tools (BRAS/CRAS)
It is reported that In Malta, Only 57% of lawyers had a business risk assessment (BRA) in place last year, placing them last in a list of sectors that includes credit institutions, gaming companies, trust services providers, notaries and accountants.
Lawyers remained laggards in a league table of sectors obliged to have a business risk assessment, a review by the Financial Intelligence Analysis Unit shows.
Only 57% of lawyers had a business risk assessment (BRA) in place last year, placing them last in a list of sectors that includes credit institutions, gaming companies, trust services providers, notaries and accountants.
However, the FIAU's drive to achieve more compliance from subject persons has left its mark since in 2019, only 44% of lawyers had a BRA in place.
The overall results show that improvements were registered in every sector as Malta continued with its anti-money laundering drive.
A BRA is a tool by which operators in financial services analyse client risk and how this can be minimised through mitigation measures. It is part of the anti-money laundering obligations imposed on key operators.
A significant improvement was seen among real estate agents. Whereas in 2019, only 46% of real estate agents had a BRA in place, this shot up to 73% last year.
The champions were credit institutions where 100% of operators had a BRA in place, followed by financial institutions at 94%.
There were 80% of accountants who had a BRA in 2020, up from 65% a year earlier.
Financial services practitioners and ancillary services to the industry were rocked by the high-profile money laundering prosecutions of late that saw partners at Nexia BT and Zenith being charged along with their clients.
In the guidance document released last week by the FIAU, the regulator noted that the number of entities that did not have a BRA dropped to 15.2% last year from 24.3% in 2019.
All sectors experienced an increase in risk assessment compliance ranging between 10% and 27%.
The Malta Gaming Authority and the Malta Financial Services Authority also contributed to the exercise.
In terms of the quality of the BRAs adopted by the operators, the FIAU said "a good number" adopted detailed methodologies that explained the approach used to determine inherent risk and control effectiveness.
But the FIAU also found deficiencies in some of the assessments presented by operators.
- "Instances were noted where the BRA did not explain how the likelihood and impact level for each inherent risk and the control effectiveness level were calculated… [some did not say] how the control measures serve to mitigate the specific risks identified," the FIAU said.
Read more at Malta Today
Meet the team of industry experts behind ComsureFind out more
Keep up to date with the very latest news from ComsureFind out more
View our latest imagery from our news and workFind out more
Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us todayGet In Touch
As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[www.gov.UK/government/publications/copyright-acts-and-related-laws]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email email@example.com.