
Landmark verdict finds BNP is Liable for Financing Genocide in Sudan
19/10/2025
BNP Paribas Held Liable for Financing Genocide in Sudan: Landmark U.S. Jury Verdict Sends Shockwaves Through Global Banking
In a historic ruling on 17 October 2025, a Manhattan federal jury found BNP Paribas, one of Europe’s largest banks, liable for enabling genocide in Sudan through its financial dealings with the regime of Omar al-Bashir.
The verdict marks a significant milestone in the intersection of financial compliance, human rights, and international law.
The jury awarded $20.75 million in damages to three Sudanese refugees, Entesar Osman Kasher, Abulgasim Abdalla, and Turjuman Adam, who suffered horrific abuses, including torture, sexual violence, and mutilation, during Sudan’s genocidal campaign in Darfur.
Their testimonies painted a chilling picture of the atrocities committed between 2002 and 2008, which were allegedly financed in part by BNP Paribas’s banking services.
The Compliance Failure
The plaintiffs argued that BNP Paribas provided critical financial infrastructure, including letters of credit and U.S. dollar clearing services, that allowed Sudan’s government to export oil and other commodities, generating billions in revenue used to fund military operations and ethnic cleansing.
This case follows BNP Paribas’s 2014 guilty plea for violating U.S. sanctions, which resulted in a record $8.97 billion settlement. However, the current civil case goes further, holding the bank directly accountable for the human consequences of its financial facilitation.
Legal and Ethical Implications
The jury concluded that BNP Paribas’s actions were a “natural and adequate cause” of the plaintiffs’ suffering. Lead counsel Bobby DiCello described the verdict as a “victory for justice,” while co-counsel Michael Hausfeld likened the case to the principles established at Nuremberg, emphasising the role of financial institutions in upholding human rights.
BNP Paribas has denounced the verdict and announced plans to appeal, arguing that its operations were legal under European law and that it lacked knowledge of the atrocities.
What This Means for Compliance Professionals.
This ruling sends a powerful message to the global financial sector: compliance is not just about regulatory checkboxes, it’s about ethical accountability. Financial institutions must ensure that their services do not indirectly support regimes or entities involved in human rights violations.
The case also opens the door for thousands of Sudanese refugees to pursue similar claims, potentially exposing BNP Paribas to billions in further liabilities.
Published: 18 October 2025 | Author: Comsure Compliance News Desk.
Sources:
- Al Jazeera https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/10/18/us-jury-finds-french-bank-bnp-paribas-complicit-in-sudan-atrocities
- Reuters via US News https://www.usnews.com/news/world/articles/2025-10-17/us-jury-finds-bnp-paribas-enabled-sudanese-atrocities
- PR Newswire https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/historic-human-rights-verdict-jury-awards-20m-to-sudanese-refugees-in-landmark-genocide-litigation-302587988.html
- Global Investigations Review https://globalinvestigationsreview.com/just-sanctions/article/bnp-paribas-found-liable-financing-genocide-in-sudan
- The Sudan Times https://thesudantimes.com/sudan/us-holds-bnp-paribas-liable-for-aiding-sudanese-ex-dictator-bashir/
- TotalNews https://totalnews.com/us-jury-holds-bnp-paribas-responsible-for-damages-related-to-its-banking-operations-in-sudan/
The Team
Meet the team of industry experts behind Comsure
Find out moreLatest News
Keep up to date with the very latest news from Comsure
Find out moreGallery
View our latest imagery from our news and work
Find out moreContact
Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us today
Get In TouchNews Disclaimer
As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[www.gov.UK/government/publications/copyright-acts-and-related-laws]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email info@comsuregroup.com.