JFSCs Martin Moloney says Jersey is not a soft touch jurisdiction
The FT has reported that:- the Jersey Financial Services Commission [JFSC] has launched a blistering attack on Neil Woodford's plan to launch a Jersey-based fund management company, saying
- The island cannot be used as a "back door" to restart his career.
The JFSC also issued a stern warning that:
- Any attempts to exploit the island's close connections with the UK through "regulatory arbitrage" were doomed to failure.
Martin Moloney, director-general of the JFSC, told the Financial Times.
- "Anyone who gets off the plane thinking that Jersey is a soft touch has wasted the price of the ticket.
- Jersey is not the place to come if you are trying to get around UK regulation or any other regulation for that matter,"
Authorisation applications by investment managers to the JFSC are usually treated confidentially. But the regulator took the unusual step of issuing a statement last month, saying
- it was "disappointed" to see a press announcement by Woodford Capital Management in advance of receiving an application for authorisation.
Martin Moloney is quoted as saying:-
- Publicity surrounding Woodford's announcement had "created the very false impression that Jersey could be used as a back door to gain access to the UK market",
- "Jersey has a "very close working relationship" with the FCA and regularly exchanges information with many fellow regulators."
- "No individual would be given "the benefit of the doubt" by the JFSC if there was any uncertainty about their fitness and probity as an investment manager."
- "We would not want Jersey to be used by anyone to avoid the kind of protections, which rightly apply to investors in the UK,"
- "We aim for equivalent or similar outcomes in terms of the level of protection that our regulatory regime provides, and we actively consider the impact that businesses here can have on investors in other jurisdictions."
Meet the team of industry experts behind ComsureFind out more
Keep up to date with the very latest news from ComsureFind out more
View our latest imagery from our news and workFind out more
Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us todayGet In Touch
As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[www.gov.UK/government/publications/copyright-acts-and-related-laws]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email email@example.com.