News
Print Article

JFSC Risk data on Sound-Business-Practice-Policy & Appendix D2

05/02/2020

As a reminder, the following JFSC changes should be considered in Jersey AML-BRAs along with policy and procedures.

Sound-Business-Practice-Policy

01 November 2019 =

https://www.jerseyfsc.org/industry/guidance-and-policy/sound-business-practice-policy/

Where an activity is regulated in Jersey and not in the target market:

Where an activity is regulated in Jersey and not in the ‘target market’, the JFSC has the right to decline the incorporation/establishment.  In addition, the JFSC has the right to decline an incorporation/establishment if, in particular, the jurisdiction appears on the JFSC’s published list of countries, and the country in which the business is being carried out has an indicator against it (http://www.jerseyfsc.org/media/2548/hb-part-1-appendix-d2-aml-handbook.pdf), unless the applicant can show that the indicator overstates the risk profile, in which case the JFSC will be willing to consider the incorporation/establishment designation as ‘high risk activity’.

For example:

Where an application for a COBO consent is being made to the JFSC by a Jersey Trust Company Business (TCB) to set up a Jersey Holding Company (JHC) to hold shares in a separate company incorporated in another jurisdiction, and the separate company engages in activity that is not subject to regulation in that jurisdiction, but would be regulated if it were carried out from or within Jersey (e.g. Trust Company Business), the starting point is that the JFSC will decline the incorporation, even though that activity is not being conducted in Jersey itself.

  • The JFSC has identified a reputational risk with the above type of incorporation
  • The JFSC is concerned primarily about incorporations of this type involving jurisdictions which do not have a trust company services law or jurisdictions which do have a trust company services law, but do not have a trust company services regulatory regime.

Possible mitigation of risk

Requiring a director from the JHC to be placed on the board of the separate company incorporated

Identify if the separate company has been incorporated in a higher (yellow) or lower risk jurisdiction (white): http://www.jerseyfsc.org/media/2548/hb-part-1-appendix-d2-aml-handbook.pdf

If the ultimate beneficial owner (UBO) is well regarded international financial institution/ other institution

If the UBO is itself a TCB operating in a regulated environment.

If the above mitigation is present, the JFSC will designate the activity as a ‘high risk activity’ thus increasing the obligations of the Jersey TCB.

The cultivation, production and supply of cannabis.

The cultivation, production and supply of cannabis in Jersey for medicinal purposes will be lawful if licensed under the Misuse of Drugs (Jersey) Law 1978 (or supply is in accordance with the lawful prescription of medicinal cannabis products). Where a licence has been granted by the Minister for Health under the said Law, consent under COBO is likely to be given.

Whilst lawful activity elsewhere is not automatically restricted, no assurance can be given at the present time not least because of the inability to define ‘equivalent’ legislation in different countries.  It is understood that this results in ambiguity.  This places Jersey in a similar position with other countries including the UK.

Among the factors underpinning this approach are:

  • Focus on securing the reputation of the island as a well-regulated centre which does not support illegal activity
  • Difficulty with funds derived from businesses investing in medicinal and recreational cannabis where both may be legal in a jurisdiction but not in Jersey
  • Dealing with jurisdictions where cannabis production may be legal but not regulated
  • Providing broader recommendations would require considerable law drafting and careful review of regulations.  Managing the potential risk would be significant.  Given industry pressure for new development and taking into account JFSC and government pressure in AML/CTF areas this issue cannot be considered a priority.

This is a developing industry and as regulations develop internationally the approach may be subject to review in the future

Appendix D2

the JFSC amended Appendix D2 of the AML/CFT Handbook, effective 24th January 2020.  Quite a number of changes, which are explained in the summary document.

Changes summarised below:

17 countries/territories have been added;

  • Azerbaijan
  • Benin
  • Bhutan
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Brunei
  • Burkina Faso
  • Cuba
  • Kosovo
  • Lake Chad Region
  • Lesotho
  • Malawi
  • Moldova
  • Montenegro
  • Serbia
  • Southern Philippines
  • West Bank and Gaza
  • Zambia

4 countries have been deleted;

  • Anguilla
  • Curacao
  • Marshall Islands
  • Philippines

The ‘sources’ have been amended for a lot of countries/territories.

JERSEY

The Team

Meet the team of industry experts behind Comsure

Find out more

Latest News

Keep up to date with the very latest news from Comsure

Find out more

Gallery

View our latest imagery from our news and work

Find out more

Contact

Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us today

Get In Touch

News Disclaimer

As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[www.gov.UK/government/publications/copyright-acts-and-related-laws]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email info@comsuregroup.com.