JFSC Findings for ICAAP themed examination programme
JFSC publish the key findings from THEIR thematic examination programme for Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP) after visiting four Jersey Incorporated Banks (JIBs)
Over recent years, our review of the Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP) for Jersey Incorporated Banks (JIBs) has been desk-based. In 2019 The JFSC performed onsite examinations as part of these Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP) assessments.
The first requirement for the ICAAP covers an assessment of capital has been expanded in Jersey, and it now also includes a liquidity adequacy assessment, and the recovery plan. The supervisory expectations for the content, production and use of the ICAAP are set out in the Pillar 2 Guidance Note (Pillar 2 in Jersey), and these are underpinned by the requirements of the Deposit-taking Business Code of Practice, in particular, principle 3 (risk management) and principle 5 (financial resources).
WHAT WAS LOOKED AT
The scope of the thematic examination focused on the following three areas, concerning the content, production and use of the ICAAP:
- Operational Risk and
- Recovery Planning.
ON THES MATTERS
- THE review of ICAAP governance has given insights into the functioning of the Board generally, the role of non-executives, organisational culture, and sign-off procedures more widely.
- OPERATIONAL RISK
- The JFSC explored how
- the banks assess their operational risk exposures,
- how these are reported, and
- The JFSC explored how
- the extent to which mitigants are put in place.
- There is a growing school of thought that the next crisis may stem from the crystallisation of operational risk. This extensive area can include
- financial crime risk,
- regulatory risk,
- and a range of other risk types.
- Recovery planning
- Recovery planning was introduced in the Pillar 2 Guidance Note in 2017. Therefore, The JFSC wanted to see how well-embedded recovery planning is becoming and how it is being used to complement stress testing and reverse stress testing.
- Where appropriate, other risks relevant to an individual bank’s business model was also explored and assessed during the examination. In addition to the core focus areas set out above, we identified common findings in relation to stress testing and reverse stress testing. The SREP assessments were completed desk-based; capital minima and Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) adjustments were agreed with banks individually, and individual examination reports were issued, setting out findings.
READ THE REPORT
- Themed Examination Feedback: Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process = https://www.jerseyfsc.org/industry/on-site-visits/themed-examination-feedback-internal-capital-adequacy-assessment-process/
Meet the team of industry experts behind ComsureFind out more
Keep up to date with the very latest news from ComsureFind out more
View our latest imagery from our news and workFind out more
Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us todayGet In Touch
As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[www.gov.UK/government/publications/copyright-acts-and-related-laws]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email email@example.com.