Jersey’s Fight Against Serious Crime - Phone Tapping and Covert Surveillance are essential.
23/03/2026
The island’s law‑enforcement agencies continue to rely heavily on phone tapping, data access, and covert intelligence operations to combat serious crime in Jersey, according to an independent oversight report released last week.
The latest annual report from the Investigatory Powers Commissioner concludes
- That Jersey’s use of intrusive investigatory powers throughout 2024 was “lawful and proportionate”, and
- That these tools made a “significant contribution” to detecting and preventing crime on the island.
What the Review Looked At
The Commissioner examined how Jersey authorities used a range of investigatory powers, including:
- Interception of communications (phone tapping and digital communication interception)
- Access to communications data (such as call records and metadata)
- Surveillance operations (overt and covert)
- Covert Human Intelligence Sources (CHIS) — informants working undercover
These powers are typically used in the most serious cases, including
- Organised crime,
- Drug trafficking, and
- High‑risk missing persons incidents.
Key Findings for 2024
The report provides a rare glimpse into the scale and nature of covert policing in Jersey:
Interception & Data Requests
- 12 interception warrants were issued during the year.
- 127 authorisations were approved for communications data — heavily linked to drug‑related investigations and missing persons cases.
Surveillance & Property Interference
- Four intrusive surveillance operations were carried out.
- Eight authorisations were granted, allowing officers to interfere with property, typically in operations targeting serious crime groups.
Standards Rated “Good” — but Improvements Needed
- Commissioner Rt Hon James Wolffe KC said that applications submitted by Jersey authorities were generally completed to a “good standard”, with clear evidence that necessity and proportionality had been carefully considered before authorisations were granted.
- While the review did identify some areas where processes could be strengthened, the Commissioner’s overall conclusion was reassuring for Islanders:
- “The people of Jersey have good reason to be confident that these powers are being used in the public interest.”
Why This Matters
- The report underscores the central role that covert and technical surveillance continues to play in Jersey’s security strategy — particularly in tackling drug crime, which remains one of the island’s most persistent law‑enforcement challenges.
- It also reinforces the importance of oversight and transparency, ensuring that powerful investigative tools are used appropriately, sparingly, and with legal safeguards.
Sources
Here is the primary, authoritative, and up‑to‑date sources you can use — including the latest annual report from the Investigatory Powers Commissioner covering Jersey’s use of surveillance powers in 2024.
- The Latest Annual Report (Primary Source) = Investigatory Powers Commissioner – Annual Report for 2024 (R.42/2026)
This is the official report you requested.
- Title: Report of the Investigatory Powers Commissioner for the period 1 January to 31 December 2024
- Presented to the States of Jersey: 17 March 2026
- Commissioner: Rt Hon James Wolffe KC
- Source: States Assembly (Official Jersey Government Publication)
- Link: https://statesassembly.je/publications/assembly-reports/2026/r-42-2026 [statesassembly.je]
This document is the authoritative record of all interception warrants, communications‑data authorisations, surveillance operations, CHIS usage, and compliance findings for the year.
- News Reports Confirming Key Findings. These sources summarise and contextualise the Commissioner's report for the public.
Jersey Evening Post Headline: Phone taps and surveillance powers ‘used lawfully’ in fight against serious crime
- Covers the 2024 findings
- Published 23 March 2026
- Link: https://jerseyeveningpost.com/news/2026/03/23/phone-taps-and-surveillance-powers-used-lawfully-in-fight-against-serious-crime/ [jerseyeven...ngpost.com]
- Additional Contextual Sources. These older reports provide a broader historical context but do not relate to the 2024 review.
Bailiwick Express – Human Errors in Prior Reports (2019) provides context on past compliance issues. [bailiwickexpress.com]
Bailiwick Express – Historical Surveillance Use (2018). Useful for tracking long‑term trends in Jersey’s surveillance strategy. [bailiwickexpress.com]
Bailiwick Express – Surveillance Law Modernisation Discussion (2025) explains how Jersey’s RIPL law (2005) is considered outdated by the watchdog. [bailiwickexpress.com]
- Other Related Jersey Law Enforcement Publications Jersey Police Authority – Publications Page Not specific to investigatory powers, but includes annual police performance reports and strategic documents. [JerseyPoli... authority.je]
The Team
Meet the team of industry experts behind Comsure
Find out moreLatest News
Keep up to date with the very latest news from Comsure
Find out moreGallery
View our latest imagery from our news and work
Find out moreContact
Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us today
Get In TouchNews Disclaimer
As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[www.gov.UK/government/publications/copyright-acts-and-related-laws]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email info@comsuregroup.com.