Jersey money laundering case convictions are based on an "irresistible inference."
On 25th April, x3 defendants were sentenced to terms of imprisonment of up to four years by the Royal Court
- The case is also significant in that investigators and prosecutors then assembled a case strong enough to secure convictions on the "irresistible inference" that the funds were criminal in nature, despite the unknown nature of the original offending that generated the funds.
Prosecutors in the Law Officers' Department have worked closely with officers of the States of Jersey Police and Jersey Customs and Immigration to secure convictions on all 22 counts of money laundering in the case of Umurzokov, Eshonkulov and Bataa.
The defendants were sentenced to terms of imprisonment of up to four years by the Royal Court on 25th April.
The case is significant in that the launderers were a professional team who had been contracted to launder cash generated by a separately organised crime group ("OCG").
The laundering team targeted the Island to launder the proceeds of the OCG's offending.
They were thwarted by the Island's law enforcement agencies and by its banks and businesses – who generally identified the risk that the funds were criminal in nature and turned down the group's attempts to transact.
The case is also significant in that investigators and prosecutors then assembled a case strong enough to secure convictions on the "irresistible inference" that the funds were criminal in nature, despite the unknown nature of the original offending that generated the funds.
Jersey's Attorney General, Mark Temple QC, commented
- "This complex case is another illustration of the determination and agility of the law-enforcement agencies of this island, which can come as an unpleasant surprise to criminals from elsewhere."
Meet the team of industry experts behind ComsureFind out more
Keep up to date with the very latest news from ComsureFind out more
View our latest imagery from our news and workFind out more
Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us todayGet In Touch
As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[www.gov.UK/government/publications/copyright-acts-and-related-laws]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email firstname.lastname@example.org.