News
JERSEY
FINANCIAL CRIME
MONEY LAUNDERING
LEGAL
YOUTUBE-IMAGE
news image Published on : 21/09/2026

Jersey keeps sending the dirty money home. MONEYVAL asked for prosecutions.

Jersey is good at taking other people’s dirty money out of its banks and sending it home. That is different from prosecuting money laundering as a crime in its own right.

John Cusack, chair of the Global Coalition to Fight Financial Crime, said so on the day the 2024 report landed.

  • Jersey is “probably in the top 10 countries on a relative basis for taking away people’s money” because the money is sitting here.

  • It is “doing better than many at taking away the money, but is not doing as well as it should be at prosecuting money laundering cases and putting people behind bars.”

Concerning leg one of Cusack’s arguments,

What we are missing is leg 2, of Cusack’s arguments,

  • The harder task of prosecuting money laundering cases and putting people behind bars

What is on the record

MONEYVAL’s Fifth Round Mutual Evaluation Report (on-site 27 September–10 October 2023; adopted May 2024) rated confiscation

  • Substantial and ML investigation and prosecution

  • Moderate. Moderate means major improvements are required. Technical compliance was strong: 39 of 40 recommendations were compliant or Largely Compliant.

On prosecutions, the report is explicit.

  • “The number of prosecutions and convictions for ML, for the period under review, is low and not in line with the jurisdiction’s context as an IFC and its risk profile.” (paragraph 246)

    • “There is only one conviction for stand-alone or autonomous ML,

    • Whereas third-party laundering convictions are very rare,

  • Which is not in line with the jurisdiction’s context as an IFC and its risk profile.” (paragraph 252)

The Jersey Money laundering cases - Selfies, Autonomous and Third Parties can be shown as:-

  • Most convictions were for self-laundering. For example, the thief who also hides the cash.

    • The biggest case in Jersey is Jeanne and Timms at Jersey Mutual.

      • A 2026 case shows Martin John Hill, former Isle of Wight hotelier (Burlington Hotel, Sandown; Shanklin Beach Hotel). Now of Alicante. He committed the predicate (UK VAT fraud) and then moved the same money through Jersey.  It sits outside the MER window.

  • One third-party conviction

    • The worked third-party example was Central Market jeweller Darius Pearce: 7½ years for washing drug cash through gold in Hatton Garden.

      •  A 2026 family case — Mariela Josefina Gomez Marquez, guilty of putting more than £37,000 of her son’s cocaine cash through her account — is third-party ML. It sits outside the MER window.

  • One stand-alone autonomous conviction - The MER does not name the single autonomous conviction. T

    • He closest public case in that window is Umurzokov, Eshonkulov and Bataa (April 2022, 22 counts, up to four years): a professional team, predicate not proved at trial, convictions on “irresistible inference.”

    • Later UK reporting on Operation Destabilise tied that network to drugs and prostitution proceeds.

No banks or other financial services

  • None of the above are financial/professional services convicted of laundering third-party proceeds.

  • What we have seen is that prosecutions of financial/professional services for failure to have adequate systems-and-controls cases; however, this is not the MoneyVal targeted offence.

Jersey’s corporate AML criminal record is short, and it does not include any laundering convictions.

  • Caversham and Bell (2005) is the sentencing baseline.

    • Still the sentencing baseline because it was the first MLO prosecution of its kind in Jersey (and, the Court said at the time, in the British Isles).

  •  Two firms have been fined in the Royal Court for Money Laundering Order failures (systems and controls under Article 37(4) of the Proceeds of Crime Law): they missed risk; they did not apply CDD.

    • Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank PJSC, Jersey Branch — 5 February 2020 and LGL Trustees Limited — 19 February 2021  

    • Neither case found that the customer’s money was itself laundered.

  • A third, older file. The lawyer is Kevin Robert Manning, solicitor (écrivain) of the Royal Court, firm K R Manning & Co.

    • He is an MLO count bolted onto his own fraud, not a third-party IFC laundering case. He took client and curatorship money to prop up the practice, then pleaded guilty to failing to keep accurate client records for six years, contrary to the Money Laundering Order (Article 37 POCL).

    • Sentenced 12 December 2018: 3½ years — 20 counts of fraudulent conversion, one fraudulent conversion as trustee, one MLO failure. Deficit of about £65,000–£94,000. Struck off. Pension later taken in confiscation.

  • In December 2024, the Island added its first Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA)

    • With Afex Offshore — MLO-style counts, a fine, no conviction. MONEYVAL treated this family of outcomes as a useful alternative rather than as Immediate Outcome 7.

  • The outcomes

    • Caversham Fiduciary / Bell — 2005 — MLO baseline.

    • Kevin Robert Manning — sentenced 12 December 2018 — fraud + one MLO count3½ years.

    • Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank PJSC, Jersey Branch5 February 2020 — MLO — £475,000 + £25,000 costs.

    • LGL Trustees Limited19 February 2021 — MLO — £550,000 + £50,000 costs.

    • Afex Offshore (Jersey) Limited — DPA 18 December 2024 — not a conviction — £408,240 + £60,000 costs.

  • None of the 5 is the MoneyVal targeted offence.

What about the money

  • Compared to the above prosecutions, Jersey has been better at freezing, seizing and returning the money, as can be shown here:-

Three ledgers, but do not add them.

  • Ledger 1 — MONEYVAL, 2018 to 2023 on-site.

    • Total recovered: €311 million. About €280 million was one file: Abacha / Doraville.

    • Jersey enforced a US civil forfeiture order and, under the February 2020 tripartite agreement, repatriated more than US$300 million to Nigeria.

    • Strip that out, and Jersey court orders in the same window are about €31 million.

    • Table 8.1: €30.9 million into the COCF from domestic post-conviction and domestic civil forfeiture, 2018–2022 — roughly €6 million a year.

    • “Domestic” means a Jersey court made the order, not that the crime happened here.

  • Ledger 2 — official repatriations, 2024–25.

    • States Annual Report: £7,651,027 sent overseas in 2025 and £3,133,204 in 2024 — £10.8 million, up 114 per cent.

    • ECCU reports almost £3 million confiscated across four unnamed 2025 cases.

    • Only Jeanne/Timms (£656,193) is in a public press release.

  • Ledger 3 — named returns.

    • Nigeria $9.5 million; Brazil £725,783; Mozambique £829,500; Benzur £397,000 shared with the UK; Jeanne/Timms £656,193; Geraldes $667,000.

    • Same pattern: money parked here, then sent home.

    • Some of these are included in the £10.8 million. Stacking them produces a fake total. Do not do it.

€311 million is not comparable to £10.8 million.

  • Different years, different currencies, different mix of foreign orders versus Jersey court orders.

  • Most of the MONEYVAL headline was another jurisdiction’s judgment, enforced because the assets were here.

Conclusion

  • Civil forfeiture (lots see above), one DPA (one prosecution) and the introduction of a failure-to-prevent money laundering offence (no prosecutions) were recognised by MONEYVAL as useful.

    • They were not treated as a substitute for prosecutions that match an IFC’s risk profile.

  • The Government High-Level Action Plan and the JFSC’s 25 recommended actions exist because

    • The evaluators required more large-scale ML cases involving foreign predicates and complex structures.

  • Jersey can defend the Substantial confiscation rating. It has not met Immediate Outcome 7.

    • Two years of £10.8 million in repatriations and

    • This week’s $667,000 does not change that.

  • However, until third-party and autonomous cases involving Jersey structures reach the Royal Court in numbers that match the threat, sending the money home remains the easier half of the job.

End

Sources

News 21.09.2026

Sources for verification

The 5 cases

1. Caversham Fiduciary / Bell — 2005

2. Kevin Robert Manning — 12 December 2018

3. Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank PJSC, Jersey Branch — 5 February 2020

4. LGL Trustees Limited — 19 February 2021

5. Afex Offshore (Jersey) Limited — DPA 18 December 2024

BAILII judgment: http://www.bailii.org/je/cases/UR/2024/2024_271.html

JERSEY FINANCIAL CRIME MONEY LAUNDERING LEGAL YOUTUBE-IMAGE

The Team

Meet the team of industry experts behind Comsure

Find out more

Latest News

Keep up to date with the very latest news from Comsure

Find out more

Gallery

View our latest imagery from our news and work

Find out more

News Disclaimer

As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[www.gov.UK/government/publications/copyright-acts-and-related-laws]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email info@comsuregroup.com.  

Archived News

To find our older articles, please click here.

View archive