JERSEY DISMISS APPEAL FOR A REDUCTION IN MONEY LAUNDERING SENTENCE
A MAN convicted of money laundering who claimed his four-year prison sentence was unfair has had his appeal against it dismissed.
Muhiddin Umurzokov (50) asked the Royal Court for
- A reduction in the sentence and
- Also for the court to lift its recommendation that he be deported after his release.
He was convicted in April of coming to Jersey with Anvarjon Eshonkulov and Batsukh Bataa in order to launder hundreds of pounds of the proceeds of crime.
- Changed some of the money into US dollars and euros and swapped Jersey banknotes for Bank of England notes.
- They also paid some into other accounts and spent cash on iPads, iPhones, Apple watches and clothes.
- They tried to buy a car and a gold and diamond watch – but were told they could not pay for the items in cash.
Speaking via an Uzbek interpreter, Umurzokov told the Royal Court that he had not benefited from the money.
Umurzokov said he had been pressured into the crime by a criminal gang who were threatening to harm his sister.
He said his four-year sentence was longer than those given to other convicted of money laundering, and that he had already served the equivalent of 18 months.
The court heard that Umurzokov had two small children, the younger of whom was born after his imprisonment.
Advocate Frances Littler, representing Umurzokov, added that he hoped to stay in Jersey and open a business in the Island upon his release.
Through his interpreter he said: ‘I am extremely remorseful. I didn’t realise how serious it was.’
However, Advocate David Hopwood, for the Crown, said the alleged threats to Umurzokov’s sister were irrelevant to his sentence – and that in any case she was now in the UK and so no longer in danger.
He added: ‘The maximum sentence for these offences is 14 years. It cannot be said that four years is manifestly excessive.
‘It is not the case that the sentencing court proceeded on the wrong basis.’
The Jurats agreed and the Bailiff, Sir Timothy Le Cocq, said: ‘We dismiss the appeal.’
Jurats Collette Crill, Steven Austin-Vautier, Kim Averty, Karen Le Cornu and David Le Heuzé were sitting.
Meet the team of industry experts behind ComsureFind out more
Keep up to date with the very latest news from ComsureFind out more
View our latest imagery from our news and workFind out more
Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us todayGet In Touch
As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[www.gov.UK/government/publications/copyright-acts-and-related-laws]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email email@example.com.