Print Article

Jersey Attorney General repatriates $529,000 to the victims of Fake Prince frauds


He issue

  • The US authorities identified $625,000 of criminal proceeds transferred to a Jersey-based account from one held in the name of an investment company set up by Anthony Gignac and his co-conspirator.

Jersey's Attorney General

  1. Jersey's Attorney General has worked with the United States Department of Justice in repatriating just under $529,000 to the United States in the case of Anthony Gignac, a Colombian-born, Michigan-raised resident of South Florida.
    1. On 4 February 2022, the Royal Court granted a Saisie judiciaire and registered the Second Partial Final Order of Forfeiture made in the United States.
    2. Part of the frozen funds were returned directly to some of Mr Gignac's victims, and
    3. in July 2022, $528,973.72 was repatriated to the United States to assist with compensating other victims.
  2. Attorney General Mark Temple QC said:
    1. "Once again, this case demonstrates that Jersey is no place for criminals to conceal their illicit assets and
    2. that every effort will be made to assist our counterparts overseas in ensuring that the victims of financial crime have their rightful assets restored".

US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida,

  1. On 14 January 2019, Gignac was indicted by a Grand Jury for the Southern District of Florida, and subsequently entered pleas of 'guilty' in respect of conspiracy to commit wire fraud; wire fraud; aggravated identity theft; and impersonating a foreign diplomat.
  2. On 31 May 2019, he was sentenced to a total of eighteen years and eight months' imprisonment.

According to the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida,

  1. Gignac's criminal career spanned over thirty years, and he saw him defraud at least twenty-six victims from at least five countries out of more than $8 million.
  2. Gignac claimed to have access to exclusive ventures in Ireland, Malta and the Middle East, and lured his victims with apparent lucrative investment opportunities, as well as promises of favourable consideration in business deals.
  3. Rather than carry out the fraud in his own person, Gignac adopted at least eighteen aliases, and portrayed himself as 'Khalid Bin Al-Saud', a fictitious Saudi prince.
  4. He posted photographs of members of the real House of Saud on his Instagram account; carried business cards bearing the titles 'Prince' and 'Sultan'; purchased luxury goods appropriate to the lifestyle of a Saudi royal; installed counterfeit diplomatic licence plates on his car; and even obtained a fake US Diplomatic Security Service badge for his bodyguard.
  5. To facilitate Gignac's criminal activity, his co-conspirators would broker meetings between potential victims and 'Khalid Bin Al-Saud', producing documents supposedly issued by high-ranking Saudi officials, a Saudi law firm, and a Jersey-based financial entity.
  6. To complete the illusion, Gignac would adopt traditional Saudi attire, and the meetings would always be conducted in line with traditional protocol. In this way, Gignac's victims were induced to present him with expensive gifts, such as jewellery and artworks, as well as invest in fraudulent business deals.
  7. Using the proceeds of his criminal activity, Gignac leased a two-bedroom condominium at a cost of $18,500 per month, funded the use of a private jet, and purchased a yacht, numerous luxury cars, jewellery, and designer clothing.
  8. In addition, the US authorities identified $625,000 transferred to a Jersey-based account from one held in the name of an investment company set up by Gignac and his co-conspirator.



The Team

Meet the team of industry experts behind Comsure

Find out more

Latest News

Keep up to date with the very latest news from Comsure

Find out more


View our latest imagery from our news and work

Find out more


Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us today

Get In Touch

News Disclaimer

As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email