Is it true that "You Cannot Manage What You Cannot Measure"

The quote “You cannot manage what you cannot measure,” often attributed to Peter Drucker or W. Edwards Deming*, underscores the value of metrics in management but oversimplifies its complexities.

While measurement is essential for tracking progress and making informed decisions, it has limitations, particularly when dealing with qualitative factors, complex systems, and human behaviour.

Critique of "You Cannot Manage What You Cannot Measure"

Below, I would like to explore why the quote is only partially correct and advocate for a balanced approach that combines measurement with qualitative judgment.

Limitations of the Quote

1. Qualitative Factors
• Many management aspects, such as employee morale, creativity, and leadership, are challenging to quantify accurately.
• For example, a manager’s emotional intelligence, crucial for team cohesion, cannot be fully captured by metrics.
2. Innovation and Creativity
• Excessive measurement can stifle innovation, which thrives in flexible environments.
• For instance, Google’s “20% time” policy allows employees to explore creative projects without rigid metrics, fostering innovations like Gmail.
3. Complex Systems
• In complex systems, not everything can be quantified due to interdependent factors.
• In supply chain management, variables like logistics, demand, and weather interact unpredictably, making comprehensive measurement challenging.
4. Human Element
• Human behaviour is often unpredictable and hard to measure.
• For example, motivating a diverse team requires interpersonal skills that defy simple metrics, relying instead on intuition and empathy.

The Role of Measurement in Management

While the quote has limitations, measurement remains a critical tool when applied thoughtfully. However, measurement alone is insufficient without analysis and action.

1. Actionable Insights
• Collecting data is only valuable if it informs decisions.
• For example, in IT, measuring the actual state of devices (not just the planned state) ensures changes are deployed effectively, as seen in software patch management.
2. Focus on Outcomes
• Measuring outcomes, not just activities, is key.
• For example, tracking customer satisfaction (an outcome) is more meaningful than counting the number of customer interactions (an activity).
3. Balanced Approach
• Effective management balances measurable and non-measurable factors.
• The pie chart below illustrates this balance, showing that while metrics are critical, qualitative factors like morale and creativity are equally vital.

Visualising the Balance

The following pie chart highlights the relative importance of measurable and non-measurable factors in management:

Conclusion

The quote “You cannot manage what you cannot measure” is partially correct, as measurement is vital for informed decision-making; however, an overemphasis on metrics risks neglecting qualitative factors, stifling innovation, and oversimplifying complex systems.

Managers can achieve more effective and holistic outcomes by balancing measurable data with qualitative insights, as illustrated in the pie chart.

Close

Note on Attribution* - The quote’s origin is debated. While often linked to Peter Drucker, it is also attributed to W. Edwards Deming, a quality control expert who emphasised measurement but cautioned against oversimplification. The phrase may be a paraphrased interpretation of their philosophies.