Print Article

Guernsey [GFSC] Sanctions Thematic Review - 2021


In 2021 the GFSC [Commission] undertook a thematic review to assess the effectiveness of banks', fiduciaries' and fund administrators' monitoring of, and compliance with, targeted financial sanctions.

The fieldwork undertaken predates the Russo-Ukrainian War and thus has not assessed the complex work firms have put in to implement sanctions on Russia since the middle of February.

Key findings
  • 86% of all Bailiwick firms subject to AML/CFT supervision rely on automated sanctions screening systems to identify sanction targets.
  • The effectiveness testing was extensive, and those subject to our testing were responsible for over 260,000 business relationships with the banks tested responsible for
    • 8% of inward transactions and
    • 6% of outward transactions in/out of the Bailiwick during 2021
  • only 56% of the fiduciary and investment firms surveyed screen their underlying assets.
    1. Of those firms screening underlying assets, some are only doing so on vessels despite these not being the only asset types of relevance.
  • Therefore, 44% of these firms may be at risk of breaching sanctions, although we have been impressed with the efforts firms have put into Russian sanctions implementation since the Russo-Ukrainian War broke out.
The results showed
  • That the sanctions screening systems of those tested were effective, with only a small minority of firms needing material improvements demonstrating that their systems are effective. These firms are now subject to risk mitigation programmes set by the Commission.
  • Local firms need to ensure they consider and document their
    1. Sanctions risks,
    2. The screening process, and
    3. The testing of the effectiveness of the sanctions screening systems employed.
Key risk conclusions
  • Firms should be alive to the risk of placing over-reliance on these systems and accepting that the process is often complex, with many different systems, databases, and staff interacting with one another to generate alerts of potential sanctions matches.
Sanctions and other risks elements
  • Effective sanctions screening is only one part of a firm managing its TF and PF risks, and firms also need to understand what TF and PF threats their business is exposed to and instil adequate controls in respect of
    1. The identification and verification of customers and their ultimate beneficial owner(s),
    2. Understand where their customers' source of funds and wealth originate from and
    3. Perform ongoing monitoring of transactions and activity to mitigate these risks fully.

  • A sanction is a measure imposed by a government to apply restrictive measures against a country, regime, individual, entity, industry or type of activity believed to be violating international law. Sanctions are imposed as a result of United Nations Security Council Resolutions aimed at preventing the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (nuclear, biological and chemical) and disrupting terrorist operations.
  • Sanctions are also used to satisfy United Kingdom foreign and national security goals, such as the unprecedented number of sanctions imposed on Russian individuals and organisations, following the invasion of Ukraine. The Bailiwick's sanctions regime mirrors that of the United Kingdom and it is imperative that sanction targets' funds, assets or other economic resources are immediately frozen and reported to the States of Guernsey's Policy and Resources Committee.


The Team

Meet the team of industry experts behind Comsure

Find out more

Latest News

Keep up to date with the very latest news from Comsure

Find out more


View our latest imagery from our news and work

Find out more


Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us today

Get In Touch

News Disclaimer

As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email