News
Print Article

Glencore Shadows Linger: Netherlands Fines Gertler-Linked Firm $30M Over Congo Graft [updated]

13/03/2026

The Netherlands has imposed a significant fine on Fleurette Properties Ltd., a Netherlands-registered holding company previously linked to Israeli billionaire Dan Gertler, in connection with a long-running bribery investigation tied to mining deals in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC).

On March 6, 2026, the Dutch Public Prosecution Service (OM) issued a penal order requiring Fleurette to pay €25.8 million (approximately $30 million) to settle allegations of foreign bribery.

The company accepted the order, paid the fine, and resolved an eight-year probe without charges against individuals or other entities.

Background of the Case

The investigation, known as "Samos," began in 2018 and focused on whether Fleurette, along with Swiss commodities giant Glencore, engaged in corrupt practices to secure lucrative mining licenses in the DRC.

Prosecutors alleged that between 2010 and 2011, Fleurette bribed a foreign public official (reported in some sources as the late Congolese businessman and politician Augustin Katumba Mwanke, a key advisor to then-President Joseph Kabila) to obtain copper and cobalt mining rights at below-market prices.

Fleurette served as the top holding company for a group of businesses involved in mining, oil, and gold extraction in the DRC from 2010 to 2017. It was closely associated with Dan Gertler, who has faced U.S. sanctions since 2017 over accusations of corruption in Congolese mining deals.

  • (Note: The settlement does not involve new charges against Gertler personally, and Dutch authorities have confirmed the probe's closure without pursuing him.)

A related Dutch investigation into Glencore concluded earlier, with a separate penalty order issued against the Swiss company in 2024, after which charges against it were dropped.

Significance of the Settlement

This case highlights ongoing international scrutiny of corruption in the DRC's mining sector, a critical source of cobalt and copper essential for global electric vehicle batteries and renewable energy technologies.

Allegations of opaque deals, under-the-table payments, and exploitation have long plagued the DRC's vast mineral wealth.

By accepting the penal order, Fleurette acknowledged guilt in bribing A SINGLE INDIVIDUAL[1] to acquire mining licenses, as established by Dutch prosecutors. The company described the matters as "historic" and stated that the payment ends the investigation.

The fine is part of a broader pattern of enforcement actions against entities linked to DRC mining corruption, including settlements in other jurisdictions involving Glencore and Gertler-associated firms.

This development underscores the challenges in combating corruption in high-value resource sectors and the role of European authorities in holding companies accountable for overseas misconduct.

Footnote [1]

The Dutch Prosecution Service press release  

Sources

Here is a compiled list of the main web sources covering recent news on the Netherlands' fine of Fleurette Properties Ltd. for €25.8 million (approx. $30 million) in the Glencore-linked DRC bribery case involving links to Dan Gertler.

These are from reliable outlets, official statements, and news reports dated around March 10–12, 2026.  

These cover the core facts from official Dutch authorities, company statements, and international media. The story broke around March 10, 2026, based on the penal order issued March 6, 2026.  

CORRUPTION FINES LEGAL

The Team

Meet the team of industry experts behind Comsure

Find out more

Latest News

Keep up to date with the very latest news from Comsure

Find out more

Gallery

View our latest imagery from our news and work

Find out more

Contact

Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us today

Get In Touch

News Disclaimer

As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[www.gov.UK/government/publications/copyright-acts-and-related-laws]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email info@comsuregroup.com.