FINTEC/REGTECH wins AML case against Dutch regulator for being "antiquated and ineffective"
Dutch challenger bank Bunq has hailed a "landmark" verdict in the Dutch courts over the use of artificial intelligence (AI) for anti-money laundering processes.
The Dutch Central Bank (DNB) had originally prohibited Bunq's use of AI and machine learning to conduct AML monitoring - a move that led Bunq to sue the central bank.
The court has subsequently sided with Bunq.
According to the bank, the unusual step of suing its banking supervisor was based on the potential "long-term detriment" to its users and the stability of the banking system as a whole had it "yielded to DNB's anti-money laundering strategy".
In a statement, Bunq referred to the DNB's stance on AML as
- "Antiquated and ineffective" and contrasted it with its use of "modern technology such as AI to mitigate risks".
Bunq also said:-
- "Where DNB insisted on using one-sided reporting from account holders - a system resting squarely on the honesty of fraudsters - Bunq favoured the use of technology such as machine learning to fight money laundering effectively,"
The challenger bank
- Even suggested that the central bank had started to change its policies just prior to the court's verdict to allow the use of machine learning and other similar technologies.
- It cited a report issued by the DNB that called for a different approach to AML that used more technology.
Bunq CEO and founder Ali Niknam stated:
- "We made history today. The court has paved the way for progress."
The heavily manual processes around AML and counter terrorist financing has long been a sticking point for digital challenger banks given that it adds significant costs in terms of reporting. This has in part led to the growth of the RegTech sector where a number of vendors have sought to use AI and ML to add more efficiency to the AML reporting obligations.
Meet the team of industry experts behind ComsureFind out more
Keep up to date with the very latest news from ComsureFind out more
View our latest imagery from our news and workFind out more
Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us todayGet In Touch
As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[www.gov.UK/government/publications/copyright-acts-and-related-laws]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email firstname.lastname@example.org.