Print Article

FCA issues £17.2m for serious failings which enabled millions in illegitimate tax reclaims [TAX CRIMES]


The FCA has fined ED&F Man Capital Markets Ltd ('MCM') £17,219,300 for severe failings in its oversight of cum-ex trading. These failings allowed MCM to collect fees for trading strategies designed to enable its clients to reclaim tax from the Danish authorities illegally.

The financial penalty of £17,219,300 imposed on MCM is the largest of the x4 concluded cum-ex trading cases. It reflects the elements of seriousness, the nature of the breaches and the significant revenue it generated for the firm.

  1. The intention of dividend arbitrage is to place shares in alternative tax jurisdictions around dividend dates, aiming to minimise withholding tax or generate withholding tax reclaims.
  2. This may involve several different trading activities, including trading and lending securities and trading derivatives, including futures and total return swaps, designed to hedge movements in the price of the securities over the dividend dates.
  3. Withholding tax (WHT) is a levy deducted at source from income and passed to the government by the entity paying it.
  4. Many securities pay periodic income in dividends or interest, and local tax regulations often impose a withholding tax on such income.
  5. In some instances where WHT is levied on payments to a foreign entity, it may be reclaimed if there is a formal treaty, called a double taxation agreement (DTA), between the country where the income is paid and the recipient's country of residence. DTAs allow for a reduction or rebate of the applicable WHT.
  6. MCM supported its clients' trades, where they failed to demonstrate their genuine entitlement to the WHT reclaims submitted by failing to prove ownership of shares, either directly or indirectly.
  1. Between February 2012 and March 2015, MCM enabled significant volumes of dividend arbitrage trading on behalf of clients, allowing clients to make withholding tax ('WHT') reclaims.
  2. It is established that £20m of the WHT reclaims made by MCM's clients to the Danish tax authority (SKAT) were illegitimate.
  3. A Dubai based trading firm within the same corporate group as MCM participated in the trading strategy which resulted in these illegitimate WHT reclaims from SKAT.
  4. These reclaims were illegitimate because under this strategy WHT was reclaimed despite no shares being owned or borrowed, no dividend being received, and no tax being paid.
  5. MCM generated £5.06m in fees from this.
  6. MCM had inadequate compliance checks and failed to ensure that this dividend arbitrage trading was legitimate. The firm's compliance function did not have the necessary expertise to monitor or review the trading and only carried out a high-level annual compliance review of the department responsible. It failed to take any steps to understand the trading activities or properly consider the risks of dividend arbitrage trading.
  1. Therese Chambers, Joint Executive Director of Enforcement and Market Oversight, said:
    • 'MCM facilitated a significant volume of trades for the purpose of making illegitimate tax reclaims from the Danish Exchequer and earned themselves significant fees.
    • It is completely unacceptable for authorised firms to make money from this kind of trading.
    • It's essential that all firms have the right controls and expertise in place to avoid the risk of being used to facilitate financial crime.'
    • This is the fourth case brought by the FCA in relation to cum-ex trading and the largest fine so far.
    • As MCM has not disputed the FCA's findings and agreed to settle, it qualified for a 30% discount under the FCA's Settlement Discount Scheme.
    • The fine includes £5.06m of income forfeited by MCM as a result of their breaches in relation to cum-ex trading.
    • This action is part of a range of measures taken by the FCA in connection with cum-ex dividend arbitrage cases and WHT schemes, which has involved proactive engagement with global law enforcement authorities.

Notes to editors

  1. Final Notice 2023: ED&F Man Markets Capital Limited
  2. The first 3 cum-ex cases concluded in
  3. There are a number of ongoing investigations into UK brokers for similar failings.
  4. The FCA publication of Market Watch 52 highlighted various issues and concerns around dividend arbitrage in 2017.
  5. FCA contributed to the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) Final Report on Cum-Ex, Cum-Cum and WHT in 2020.
  6. MCM breached Principle 2 and Principle 3 of the FCA's Principles for Business between February 2012 and March 2015.
  7. Principle 2 states that 'a firm must conduct its business with due skill, care and diligence'.
  8. Principle 3 states that 'a firm must take reasonable care to organise and control its affairs responsibly and effectively, with adequate risk management systems'.

Press Releases First published: 05/06/2023 Last updated: 05/06/2023



The Team

Meet the team of industry experts behind Comsure

Find out more

Latest News

Keep up to date with the very latest news from Comsure

Find out more


View our latest imagery from our news and work

Find out more


Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us today

Get In Touch

News Disclaimer

As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email