FCA FINES 2021 – 6 MONTHS IN, AND THE FINES ARE LOW!!!
So far, 2021 has seen the level of FCA fines drop off a cliff from 2020. So far, there have been x3 fines totalling £298,000 in fines, whereas, in 2020, we saw a total of £200 million in fines.
- Sapian Capital (fined £178k) - cum/ex trading, dividend arbitrage and withholding tax (WHT) reclaim schemes
PRIN 2 and PRIN 3 breaches – Financial crime risk
- The first FCA case concerning cum/ex trading, dividend arbitrage and withholding tax (WHT) reclaim schemes.
- Breaches relate to failings that led to the risk of facilitating fraudulent trading and money laundering.
- The fine would have been higher, but the amount was curbed to avoid 'serious financial hardship',
- "The FCA expects firms have systems and controls that test the purpose and legitimacy of transactions, reflecting scepticism and alertness to the risk of money laundering and financial crime, and failures here constitute serious misconduct."
Mark Steward, Enforcement & Market Oversight, FCA
- Sapien did not undertake appropriate due diligence and failed to perform adequate risk assessments on clients introduced by the Solo Group.
- Sapien executed purported OTC equity trades of approximately £2.5 billion in Danish equities and £3.8 billion in Belgian equities.
- The Solo trading was characterised by what appeared to be a circular pattern of extremely high-value trades undertaken to avoid the normal need for payments and delivery of securities in the settlement process.
- The trading pattern involved the use of Over the Counter (OTC) equity trading, securities lending and forward transactions involving EU equities, on or around the last day securities were cum dividend.
- The way the Solo Group and their clients conducted these trades, combined with their scale and volume, were highly suggestive of financial crime and appear to have been undertaken to create an audit trail to support withholding tax reclaims in Denmark and Belgium.
- Simon John Varley (fined £68.3k) – providing false information
Section 63A FSMA/APER 1 & FIT breaches - Lack of honesty & integrity
- Simon Varley, formerly a Director of Dickinsons, a Birmingham based IFA, was fined and banned from working in financial services by the FCA.
- He had been knowingly performing a controlled function without approval and providing investment advice to retail customers when he knew he was not qualified or approved to do so.
- Mr Varley repeatedly misled his fellow directors by providing false information in board meetings about sitting and passing the relevant exams required.
- He falsely claimed that he had applied for CF30 approval but that the FCA had not updated the Financial Services Register. In fact, he made no application.
- Mr Varley also knowingly facilitated the provision of false information to Dickinsons' PII (professional indemnity insurance) providers about the qualifications he held to be insured to advise retail investors after 2013.
- As part of his CF10 function, Mr Varley was required to provide regulatory information to the FCA in Dickinsons' Retail Mediation Activities Returns.
- In discharging this responsibility, Mr Varley knowingly misled the FCA into believing that only one person at Dickinsons was providing retail investment advice to customers instead of two. He also provided explanations to the FCA that were untrue to conceal his own misconduct.
- Mr Varley's actions led to Dickinsons voluntary liquidation and being dissolved.
- Adrian Horn (fined £52.5k) – "wash trading."
Breaches of MAR and FIT
- Adrian Horn, a former market-making trader at Stifel Nicolaus Europe, was fined for market abuse and prohibited from performing any functions in relation to regulated activity.
- The FCA found Mr Horn had engaged in market abuse by executing trades with himself in the shares of McKay Securities.
- He had placed buy orders in McKay shares that traded with his existing sell orders (and vice versa).
- This practice is known as 'wash trading.
- These orders were placed in a way to avoid anyone detecting that he was wash trading. The aim was to ensure that McKay stocks remained in the FT All-Share Index. The financial penalty was reduced by 25% as a result of significant cooperation. In addition, Mr Horn received a further 30% settlement discount.
- "The FCA has also developed ways to detect this type of manipulation as well as other forms of market abuse and, as this case demonstrates, we will take robust action against such abuse."
Mark Steward, Enforcement & Market Oversight, FCA
Meet the team of industry experts behind ComsureFind out more
Keep up to date with the very latest news from ComsureFind out more
View our latest imagery from our news and workFind out more
Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us todayGet In Touch
As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[www.gov.UK/government/publications/copyright-acts-and-related-laws]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email email@example.com.