Print Article

FCA £6.4 FINE FOR AML FAILS @ ADM Investor Services International Limited


The FCA fines ADM Investor Services International Limited £6,470,600 for serious financial crime control failings.

A broker, ADM Investor Services International Limited (ADMISI) has been fined £6,470,600 for inadequate anti-money laundering (AML) systems and controls.

The nature of ADMISI’s business and client base presented potentially high levels of money laundering risk because of its business model, the geographical location of its customers, the proportion of its business involving high-risk clients and because it had Politically Exposed Persons as clients.

The FCA raised concerns with ADMISI in 2014 about its AML systems, including the absence of a formal process to classify customers by risk. The FCA expected ADMISI to make improvements.

However, during a 2016 firm visit, the FCA found significant failings remained. In particular:

  • The firm’s AML customer risk assessment was basic and did not enable an assessment of a customer’s financial crime risk.
  • It did not conduct a firm-wide money laundering risk assessment.
  • There was little evidence of adequate ongoing monitoring in the form of periodic customer reviews.
  • Policies needed to be updated and referred to old legislation.

After the 2016 visit, the ADMISI agreed to requirements, including one not to take on business from high-risk customers in order to lessen the threat of the firm being used to launder money or finance crime. By the end of October 2016, ADMISI had introduced AML policies and procedures to address the concerns identified. After further remedial action, the requirements were lifted in January 2018.

Therese Chambers, Joint Executive Director of Enforcement and Market Oversight, said: 'All financial firms need to have effective anti-money laundering checks in place. ADM Investor Services’ failures put it at risk of being used to facilitate financial crime. These failings continued even after the firm had received clear warnings on the need to improve its systems.'

The firm did not dispute the FCA’s findings and exercised its right, under the FCA’s partly contested case process, to ask the FCA’s Regulatory Decisions Committee to assess the appropriate level of penalty. The firm’s agreement to accept the FCA’s findings meant it qualified for a 30% settlement discount. Otherwise, the FCA would have imposed a financial penalty of £9,243,738.

Notes to editors

  • Final Notice: ADMISI.
  • The FCA regulates DMISIA.
  • These failings were a breach of Principle 3 the Principles for Businesses, which requires a firm to take reasonable steps to ensure that it has organised its affairs responsibly and effectively, with adequate risk management systems.
  • Firms that fail to implement adequate AML systems and controls are exposed to the risk of financial crime and benefit from an unfair competitive advantage over compliant firms because they save on the costs involved in implementing such systems and because they are attractive to customers who wish to avoid customer due diligence and more rigorous enhanced due diligence checks.


The Team

Meet the team of industry experts behind Comsure

Find out more

Latest News

Keep up to date with the very latest news from Comsure

Find out more


View our latest imagery from our news and work

Find out more


Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us today

Get In Touch

News Disclaimer

As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email