Print Article

Defeating Money Laundering with Rational Thinking, Not Compliance Red-Flags


I came across the following Regulatory Ramblings podcast on LinkedIn – I suggest it is worth looking into 😊

In this episode of Regulatory Ramblings, Dr. Mariola Marzouk, an AML expert who has co-founded Vortex Risk Ltd (UK), shares her insights on trade-based money laundering (TBML), and her philosophy on financial crime prevention.

Ep #48 With Mariola Marzouk (Vortex Risk Ltd.)

Dr. Mariola Marzouk is an anti-money laundering (AML) professional with extensive experience in regulatory software and consulting across both the public and private sectors. Her career has involved working with global banks on how best to use technologies to address regulatory compliance demands.

Scan to listen on mobile 

In 2023, after completing her doctorate in criminal justice with a focus on trade-based money laundering (TBML) and technology, she co-founded Vortex Risk Ltd. with her colleague Dr Nicholas Gilmour (himself a guest on episode #18 of Regulatory Ramblings). The firm provides insights into money laundering practices to individuals and organizations worldwide. Vortex Risk’s approach is to empower clients by offering perspectives akin to rational-thinking criminals operating discreetly to evade regulatory suspicion.

Over the course of her career, Mariola has held strategic product management positions at internationally recognized companies such as British Aerospace and Engineering (BAE) Applied Intelligence, EY, NICE Actimize, and Napier AI.

Specializing in financial crime prevention, she has demonstrated expertise in detecting money laundering schemes using advanced technologies. Over time, her focus extended to the ever-growing specter of TBML, and her research in this area has garnered recognition within the industry. Mariola’s pilot study on Brexit’s impact on TBML has been published in the Journal of Money Laundering Control, featured on GTR News, and cited by the Institute of Export and International Trade UK.

In this episode of Regulatory Ramblings, she chats with host Ajay Shamdasani, describing her path from Poland to the UK, first as a student and now as a much sought-after financial crime professional in London.

The conversation underscores Mariola’s philosophy: defeating money laundering requires rational thinking and not merely compliance red flags. She eschews the notion of compliance as an exercise in perfunctory box-ticking and form-filing – a perennial lament in the profession.

She shares that her approach towards AML more generally is to precisely deploy RegTech to aid regulated entities in detecting criminality. While acknowledging that data analytics and artificial intelligence (AI) are important tools in the battle against financial crime, she stresses that technology is not a panacea and works best when used in tandem with the skills, temperament, wisdom, and judgment that experienced professional researchers and investigators have developed over time. AI is no substitute for analysis by a human and good old common sense.

Mariola admits that while she does not have a background in science, technology, engineering, or math (STEM), her experience as a product manager and corporate strategist has afforded her insight into what customers need from technical solutions and a sense of discernment about when to apply which technologies, if at all. While not a techie per se, she has developed an understanding of technological development and how and when it should be deployed to solve certain problems. Ultimately, tools should meet the objectives of problem solving, she says.

She recounts the various learning curves she experienced coming from the business side while coming to grips with the more technical aspects of roles throughout her career.

The discussion concludes with Mariola stating her views on the prevailing state of hypocrisy that exists in the world of AML and sanctions enforcement. The financial world is all too often regulated from Washington, New York, London, and Brussels. Yet, while the US and UK are some of the most aggressive jurisdictions when it comes to financial crime enforcement actions, their regulatory apparatus is often used to further their own geopolitical goals. It is a view outside of the West that Mariola says is not without merit.

Podcast Discussion

The full conversation, marked with key topics/chapters on the player, spans about 79 minutes.

3:09 Mariola Marzouk's Journey into Financial Crime

9:58 Combating Trade-Based Money Laundering: A Personal Pursuit of Restorative Justice

15:25 Disrupting the Norm: Money Laundering and Regulatory Realities

26:43 Unveiling Trade-Based Money Laundering: Beyond Trade Finance Myths

35:03 Technology in Regulatory Compliance: Unfulfilled Promises and Hidden Realities

41:08 The Disconnect and Challenges in Developing Effective RegTech Solutions

50:20 Challenges of Automation and Critical Thinking in Financial Crime Compliance

1:02:52 Assessing the Effectiveness of Sanctions Amidst Strategic Adaptations

1:06:34 Bridging Divides through Education

1:12:57 Gender Dynamics and the Future of Anti-Money Laundering

(On desktop, hover and click this icon for chapter navigation)

The full conversation, marked with key topics/chapters on the player, spans about 79 minutes.

Full list of our podcasts/episodes and apps where you can listen them.


The Team

Meet the team of industry experts behind Comsure

Find out more

Latest News

Keep up to date with the very latest news from Comsure

Find out more


View our latest imagery from our news and work

Find out more


Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us today

Get In Touch

News Disclaimer

As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email