[CPI] CORRUPTION PERCEPTIONS INDEX WILDLY WRONG!!!!
Another year, another iteration of the CPI Transparency International’s multi-coloured map, showing how countries in Asia, Africa, and South America are more corrupt than rich places [https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2021]
The CPI is extremely influential, but it is also wildly wrong, which is troubling because it is the one thing people who don’t know about corruption always call on when looking to see what’s going on; on this, Oliver Bullough [https://www.linkedin.com/in/oliver-bullough-b02b8b29/?originalSubdomain=uk] has said:-
- Pretty much everyone I’ve ever spoken to at Transparency International recognizes that it’s flawed at best,
- Which raise the uncomfortable thought that the organization only keeps producing it because it’s such a good marketing tool.
Oliver has further said:
- The Corruption Perceptions Index, which defines corruption along the lines of what happens in poor countries rather than rich countries, and then sensationally reveals that there is more of it in poor countries than in rich countries.
- It’s a little like studying the drug trade only by looking at where drugs are produced, rather than where they’re consumed.
- Basically, you can’t rate countries by how corrupt they are, as if it’s a competition, because corruption is transnational, the money and its owners cross borders.
- Blaming Nigeria for being corrupt, while ignoring Britain’s role in laundering Nigerian politicians’ money, is not just unfair; it’s inaccurate.
- Scandinavian countries remain at the top of the index [as good countries] for another year, yet there isn’t a country in the region that hasn’t seen its corporations implicated in corruption in Eastern Europe.
Meet the team of industry experts behind ComsureFind out more
Keep up to date with the very latest news from ComsureFind out more
View our latest imagery from our news and workFind out more
Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us todayGet In Touch
As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[www.gov.UK/government/publications/copyright-acts-and-related-laws]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email email@example.com.