News
Print Article

Court Dismisses Claim Against Lawyer Tied to ‘CryptoQueen,’

17/12/2025

A London court has dismissed a claim against Claire Gill, the lawyer formerly representing Ruja Ignatova, the fugitive “CryptoQueen” behind the OneCoin fraud, after allegations of professional misconduct were raised by investor Jennifer McAdam. [legalnewsfeed.com]

Background on the Dispute

  • In April 2017, Claire Gill, then of Carter‑Ruck, sent a letter to Jennifer McAdam, warning her against publishing YouTube videos that accused OneCoin and Ignatova of fraud, threatening defamation proceedings if she did not comply. [news.bitcoin.com], [news.superex.com]
  • McAdam, who lost her inheritance in the OneCoin scheme, was described by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) as “vulnerable” at the time of the threat. [news.bitcoin.com], [news.superex.com]

Regulatory Action and Legal Arguments

  • The SRA charged Gill with issuing “improper” legal threats in defence of a case already under heavy fraud suspicion. [news.bitcoin.com], [cryptopolitan.com]
  • Her defence team argued Gill was acting on the instructions of her client—OneCoin—and believed the allegations were false. They emphasised that no formal lawsuit had been filed and claimed that her actions constituted lawful advocacy. [news.bitcoin.com], [news.superex.com]

Dismissal on Procedural Grounds

  • A court has dismissed McAdam’s claim on procedural grounds, citing the legal complexities of enforcing accountability in global unregulated markets such as cryptocurrency. [legalnewsfeed.com]
  • The decision underscores the nuanced challenge of prosecuting misconduct tied to digital financial fraud. It reflects procedural hurdles when dealing with cross-border, unregulated crypto schemes. [legalnewsfeed.com]

Broader Implications

  • The case reveals enforcement difficulties in international fraud cases, particularly in the evolving terrain of digital currencies.
  • It highlights increasing regulatory concerns about SLAPPs (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation) and intimidation tactics, prompting UK authorities to reassess legal frameworks. [news.superex.com], [news.bitcoin.com]

Source Links

  • Full article: Legal News Feed — “Court Dismisses Case Against Lawyer Tied to ‘Cryptoqueen,’ Highlighting Challenges in Cryptocurrency Fraud Prosecution” (link) [legalnewsfeed.com]
  • Bitcoin News — “Solicitor for Fugitive Ruja ‘Cryptoqueen’ Ignatova Accused of Issuing Improper Legal Threats” (link) [news.bitcoin.com]
  • Superex News — “UK Targets Lawyer Linked to OneCoin Scandal in Misconduct Probe” (link) [news.superex.com]

 

FRAUD LEGAL CRYPTO UNITED KINGDOM

The Team

Meet the team of industry experts behind Comsure

Find out more

Latest News

Keep up to date with the very latest news from Comsure

Find out more

Gallery

View our latest imagery from our news and work

Find out more

Contact

Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us today

Get In Touch

News Disclaimer

As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[www.gov.UK/government/publications/copyright-acts-and-related-laws]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email info@comsuregroup.com.