City traders jailed for £315m Balli Group fraud, but where is the money?????
The X3 executives at a London commodities trader, Balli Group, where a Tory peer was a director, are jailed following a £315 million bank fraud.
The Serious Fraud Office found that the company had forged documents to obtain bank financing for at least ten months before Lord Lamont of Lerwick, resignation.
- The group’s main business was Balli Steel, based in Mayfair, which acted as a middleman in arranging sales from suppliers to customers.
- Its trading was unprofitable at the start of 2012, and the company was using “delaying tactics and lies” when banks asked why their loans were not repaid, the court was told.
- Alaghband, 62, from Hampstead, north London, was jailed at Southwark crown court for six years and six months, having admitted fraudulent trading. He was banned from being a company director for 12 years.
- Erda, 56, was jailed for three years and ten months after being found guilty of six counts of conspiracy to defraud relating to more than £100 million of bank loans.
- Worsell, 68, of Gillingham, Kent, was jailed for three years and two months after being found guilty of four counts of conspiracy to defraud relating to more than £75 million of loans.
- The prosecution of Alaghband’s brother, Vahid, 71, who was chairman of Balli Group, on charges of fraudulent trading and conspiracy to defraud was halted because he was unwell.
- David Spriddell, the former finance director of Balli Steel, was found not guilty of fraudulent trading.
DUCKED A BULLET
- Lord Lamont of Lerwick, the former chancellor, resigned as a non-executive director of Balli Group three days before the board called in accountants to try to rescue the business.
- There is no suggestion that he was aware of the fraud and was not involved in the court case.
Meet the team of industry experts behind ComsureFind out more
Keep up to date with the very latest news from ComsureFind out more
View our latest imagery from our news and workFind out more
Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us todayGet In Touch
As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[www.gov.UK/government/publications/copyright-acts-and-related-laws]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email firstname.lastname@example.org.