Chinese Court to Curb Foreign Sanctions
According to a recent report from the South China Morning Post (SCMP), China's Supreme People's Court has created a new financial court in Beijing tasked explicitly with reviewing cases where Financial Institutions (FIs) and other businesses are alleged to have "damaged the legitimate interests" of Chinese investors by following the requirements of overseas sanctions.
The Beijing Financial Court is the second of its kind to be created in China, following the establishment of the Shanghai Financial Court in August 2018.
Although the Supreme People's Court has not yet published a whole statute outlining the new court's jurisdiction, its inaugural session is likely soon.
In its statement on the development, the Supreme People's Court said that the new court would have "centralized jurisdiction" over cases involving overseas-listed Chinese or foreign companies and foreign FIs.
The Chinese authorities have presented the move as a direct counter to the actions of the US, which has increasingly used economic and financial sanctions against China and Chinese businesses as leverage in a range of disagreements over trade, the status of Hong Kong, and geopolitical issues in the region.
Several major Chinese companies, such as the significant chip producer SMIC, has already been designated by the US government because of reported links to the Chinese government and military, and non-Chinese FIs have been required to cease and desist from doing business with designated Chinese nationals and corporations.
The creation of the court is one of a succession of recent actions supporting China's evolving 'push back' strategy against US measures.
Last year, China amended its securities law to target overseas FIs that were perceived to have caused damage to Chinese investors, and similar clauses will appear in forthcoming laws on financial futures and commercial banking.
In September 2020, the Chinese Ministry of Commerce also introduced an 'Unreliable Entity List', for "foreign firms and individuals who violate normal market transactions in China, interrupt deals with Chinese firms, or take discriminatory measures against Chinese firms."
Punishments for those added to the list could include economic and financial sanctions, and for individuals, travel restrictions. So far no company or company official has been added.
The creation of the court also comes at a time of increasing tension between China and the US and its allies.
Despite the change of US administration from former President Trump to President Biden, the US has maintained a demanding tone towards China, with the recent imposition of new sanctions against 24 Chinese officials alleged to have been involved in undermining Hong Kong's autonomy.
The US has also very recently coordinated with the EU, UK and Canada on the implementation of sanctions against Chinese officials and a security and construction organization alleged to have been involved in human rights abuses against the Uyghur population in China's Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region.
China has responded to the EU sanctions with the imposition of travel bans on 10 EU officials and four institutions.
These developments suggest that sanctions will continue to be 'tools of choice' for western countries seeking to influence China, especially as the EU now seems more willing to join the US in their application and the UK is pivoting towards a more critical view of Chinese behaviour.
Combined with this, of course, it also appears that China will be seeking to respond in kind with counter-sanctions of its own, generating an increasingly difficult landscape to negotiate for businesses with regional and global interests.
Meet the team of industry experts behind ComsureFind out more
Keep up to date with the very latest news from ComsureFind out more
View our latest imagery from our news and workFind out more
Think we can help you and your business? Chat to us todayGet In Touch
As well as owning and publishing Comsure's copyrighted works, Comsure wishes to use the copyright-protected works of others. To do so, Comsure is applying for exemptions in the UK copyright law. There are certain very specific situations where Comsure is permitted to do so without seeking permission from the owner. These exemptions are in the copyright sections of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended)[www.gov.UK/government/publications/copyright-acts-and-related-laws]. Many situations allow for Comsure to apply for exemptions. These include 1] Non-commercial research and private study, 2] Criticism, review and reporting of current events, 3] the copying of works in any medium as long as the use is to illustrate a point. 4] no posting is for commercial purposes [payment]. (for a full list of exemptions, please read here www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright]. Concerning the exceptions, Comsure will acknowledge the work of the source author by providing a link to the source material. Comsure claims no ownership of non-Comsure content. The non-Comsure articles posted on the Comsure website are deemed important, relevant, and newsworthy to a Comsure audience (e.g. regulated financial services and professional firms [DNFSBs]). Comsure does not wish to take any credit for the publication, and the publication can be read in full in its original form if you click the articles link that always accompanies the news item. Also, Comsure does not seek any payment for highlighting these important articles. If you want any article removed, Comsure will automatically do so on a reasonable request if you email email@example.com.